Reducing potentially avoidable acute care transfers from long-term care homes: Developing a taxonomy of interventions and improving approaches to evaluate intervention effectiveness
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Potentially avoidable emergency department (ED) transfers and hospitalizations from long-term care (LTC) homes, providing 24-hour nursing care, represent an important quality of care challenge. These events are defined as those stemming from clinical conditions that theoretically could be managed onsite with appropriate primary care. They may occur contrary to residents’ advance directives, expose residents to serious adverse events, and represent inefficiencies in healthcare systems. There are important limitations of research investigating interventions aimed at reducing transfers from LTC. These limitations make it challenging to adapt any proposed intervention to the needs and preferences of transfer decision-makers, mainly, primary care physicians, other front-line staff, LTC residents and their family members. The primary aim of this dissertation was to conduct a series of methodological and substantive substudies to advance knowledge about potentially avoidable acute care transfers from LTC homes and the interventions aimed at their reduction. The secondary aim was to inform the design of future studies such that they can assess the impact of an exposure of interest that exists under regular conditions (non-experimental) on reducing a meaningful and contextually relevant outcome using causal inference methods. In the first manuscript, I addressed the challenges related to the complexity of interventions that aimed at reducing ED transfers and/or hospitalizations among LTC residents experiencing an acute change in their health. Given the inconsistencies and confusion in the literature regarding intervention terminology, I conducted a systematic scoping review to propose a cohesive taxonomy of such interventions. In synthesizing 90 studies, I identified six intervention categories (e.g., advance care planning, transitional care), and four intervention components (i.e., human resources, training, technology, tools). In the second manuscript, I tackled the shortcomings in the literature surrounding measurement of acute care transfers from LTC. Using real-world data pertaining to a sample of Quebec LTC residents who received care in a tertiary hospital ED, I measured proportions of potentially avoidable ED transfers and hospitalizations associated with conditions manageable onsite and compared these proportions with those reported for the rest of Canada. A total of 1,233 transfers by 692 residents were recorded, among which 36.3% were classified as being potentially avoidable. Potentially avoidable ED transfers with or without hospitalizations accounted for 95% of potentially avoidable transfers, and hence, were identified as an important LTC quality measure. Proportions of all outcomes in Quebec were comparable to those from the rest of Canada.In the third manuscript, using acute care transfers from the LTC setting as a motivating example, I illustrated the usefulness of conceptualizing a causal diagram that encodes known or suspected associations between measured and unmeasured factors, the exposure of interest (advance care planning) and the primary study outcome (potentially avoidable ED transfers). I demonstrated how encoded information representing realistic study scenarios can be used to design and implement the Monte-Carlo simulation analyses using standard statistical software for repeated simulation. This dissertation has implications for future research, clinical practice, and primary care policy-making. Findings provide important insights into proactive models of person-centred care in LTC homes. The proposed taxonomy of interventions can inform successful intervention designs and allow to draw meaningful conclusions about their effectiveness/efficacy in future literature reviews which would be necessary for eventual policy change. The results from these three dissertation manuscripts will inform future observational studies, including that of my research group which plans to conduct further investigation
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,199 | 0,326 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,013 | 0,014 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,022 | 0,014 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,014 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».