Navigating multiple identities through art-making: stories of artists with congenital and acquired physical impairments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Constructing and negotiating one’s identities is a central life task that continues across the lifespan and occurs within specific social, cultural, and historical contexts. For persons with impairments, dominant social beliefs and ideas embedded within these contexts, are likely to shape self-perceptions and the identities individuals construct. While negative stereotypes and ideas have historically been associated with disability, this diverse group of people has strived, both collectively and individually, to resist negative characterizations. One example of these efforts is the Disability Arts Movement and within the existing literature, we find evidence that creating and sharing art can help individuals with a stigmatized difference develop less negative, and more explicitly positive disability identities (Swain, French & Cameron, 2003), as well as serving as an avenue for developing and affirming one’s valued identity as an artist (Sulewski, 2012). In this study, I build from this evidence to explore the more specific question of how Contemporary Canadian artists with physical impairments, both congenital and acquired, negotiate their multiple intersecting identities. I use disability and artist identities as entry points and investigate how art-making can be used to manage a host of other valued identities. Two theoretical frameworks, the social model of disability, and intersectional theory have guided me in this work. A narrative methodology was used to examine how identities changed over time. Participants were recruited through flyers, word of mouth, list servers, and attending community events. Twelve individuals with acquired and / or congenital physical impairments agreed to be interviewed for this research project. Participants’ identities, in particular their identity as a person with an impairment and an artist, developed and changed over time in multiple ways. These identities solidified over time but were also revised and evolved based on other life experiences. With respect to their embodied experience, they identified environmental and interpersonal challenges, the ways they coped with these challenges, as well as how these experiences informed the process of accepting themselves as persons with different bodies. Additionally, they described their artistic practise, the functions their practise played in their lives over time, and how their practise was informed by living with different bodies. Furthermore, they described their experiences at multiple life stages and in multiple contexts, including family, school, work, along with disability and artistic communities. These experiences supported the development of a host of intersecting identities. More specifically, influencing, and reinforcing both positive and negative self-perceptions tied to disability, artist, family, partner, student and community identities. The multiple ways this study built upon the existing literature and unique contributions were identified. From the results, several research and clinical practice implications were also identified
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,030 | 0,029 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,012 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».