MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161953886 · doi:10.82308/15061

The adaptive capacities of Canadian correctional officer recruits: Exploring experiences of and responses to acute and traumatic stress

2023· dissertation· en· W7161953886 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katy Konyk

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOfficerStressorWorkforcePsychological interventionCoping (psychology)StaffingPsychological resilienceOccupational stress

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The work of correctional officers (COs) is multifaceted. Within prisons, they are responsible for maintaining the safety of prisoners, intervening to prevent injuries and fatalities, and caring for some of society’s most vulnerable people. They navigate their roles amidst numerous occupational stressors which range from quotidian difficulties like staffing shortages, to more acute sources of stress like violence. Across Canada, the psychological well-being of COs is of growing concern. Nonetheless, many COs engage in health sustaining behaviours and demonstrate resilience in the face of many occupational stressors. To date, little research has documented experiences of resilience and coping strategies amongst COs on the job. Even less is known about the capacity to navigate stress and demonstrate resilience after exposure to a potentially psychologically traumatic event (PPTE) that COs in training - correctional officer recruits (CORs) - bring with them as they enter the workforce. Knowledge of pre-existing coping and resilience capacities can be applied to strengthen existing supportive interventions to promote employee well-being once CORs have completed their training and enter the workforce.Thus, in this dissertation, the physiological, emotional, and cognitive experiences of and adaptations to moments of acute and potentially traumatic stress, labeled overwhelm, in CORs are explored. Starting from the assumption that CORs enter the workforce with prior experience navigating moments of stress and trauma, I seek to understand how they experience these moments and what adaptive capacities they bring to their roles in corrections. In the research, three separate manuscripts examine overwhelm via the following questions: what is the experience, physiologically, emotionally, and behaviourally, of overwhelm for CORs? How do CORs navigate moments of overwhelm? And what are the adaptive capacities of CORs upon entering federal corrections? In the first manuscript, the method of phenomenology is used to explore the lived experiences of CORs with overwhelm. In the second manuscript, I draw on grounded theory to examine how CORs navigate moments of overwhelm. In the third manuscript, I apply grounded theory to understand how CORs are impacted by exposure to PPTEs and what capacities for resilience and growth exist after those exposures.In the results, I demonstrate that for CORs, overwhelm is a dysregulatory experience, physiologically, emotionally, and cognitively. Moreover, it is not experienced as a single moment, but, for some, the internal dysregulation continues after the stressor is no longer present. Many CORs describe strategies to navigate both the external stressor and internal experience of stress. Additionally, CORs draw on relational support to navigate acute and potentially traumatic stress and some even use the experience as an opportunity to learn and grow. I elucidate both the types of events that CORs perceived as potentially psychologically traumatic and the spectrum of reactions they described in response to these events. In doing so, I highlight potential pathways for resilience to PPTEs amongst CORs.Individuals enter the correctional workforce with multiple ways of navigating acutely stressful and potentially traumatic events. The findings are the basis of an operationalization of the core experiential features of acute stress (i.e., overwhelm), an outcome commonly researched amongst COs. Based on my findings, I suggest that individuals need to resolve external stressors and also take steps to process the embodied experience of stress after an exposure occurs, thus reiterating the value of social supports through coworkers, family, and friends, in navigating high stress careers. These findings inform work on the psychological well-being of COs and other professionals in high-stress jobs across the disciplines of social work, sociology, and psychology

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,132
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,265

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,009
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,129
Tête enseignante GPT0,349
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→