MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161958402 · doi:10.82308/27141

Conventional concentrically braced frames with I-shape braces and bolted brace connections

2021· dissertation· en· W7161958402 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chen Wang

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSeismic Performance and Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBraceEurocodeEarthquake resistanceSeismic analysisDeformation (meteorology)BucklingBracing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In low and moderate seismic regions, low-ductility concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are widely used as the seismic force-resisting system for steel structures. Unlike high-ductility CBFs, the capacity-based design principle and additional seismic detailing are not required for such systems, which are referred to as conventional CBFs (CCBFs) in this study. In CCBFs, the brace-to-gusset connections are inherently weaker than the adjoining gusset plates and braces when loaded in tension. This occurs because both the gusset plates and the braces are most often selected based on their respective compressive buckling resistances, and hence, typically have a much greater resistance in tension. As such, brace connections are critical for the seismic behaviour and collapse prevention performance of CCBFs. However, brace connections have received little research attention because they are usually assumed to remain elastic in most capacity-based designs, and as such, their inelastic behaviour is not fully understood at a fundamental level. This is reflected in the different code provisions: in Canada, the seismic design force must be amplified by 1.5 for brace connections in CCBFs unless these connections are proven to be ductile as per CSA S16-19; in New Zealand, for connections in CCBFs, a structural performance factor of 1.0 is required, compared with 0.9 for structural members, which effectively increases the seismic design force demand on connections as per NZS 3404; no analogous requirements exist for CCBFs in the USA as per ANSI/AISC 341-16 or in Europe as per Eurocode 8.The inelastic behaviour of and the seismic deformation demand on CCBF brace connections were studied through a two-level numerical simulation approach, which is presented in this thesis. The bolted flange plate connection of the I-shape brace, which is a common design choice for CCBFs, was selected as the subject of this study.At the connection level, a high-fidelity finite element (FE) simulation procedure was developed for the bolted flange plate connection and validated against laboratory test results. The force transfer mechanism within the branches of the connection was characterized. Subsequently, a parametric study based on the validated numerical simulation procedure was carried out. Three key design parameters, namely, the gusset plate thickness, the flange lap plate thickness, and the web lap plate thickness, were varied to study their effects on both the compressive and tensile behaviour of the brace and the connection assembly. Various deformation mechanisms and failure modes were revealed under both compression and tension. Design recommendations are proposed with regards to attaining better deformation capacity.Based on the knowledge gained from the high-fidelity numerical simulations, a computationally efficient component-based modeling method was developed for the bolted brace connection. The connection was discretized into individual components, and modeled by means of organized springs, which each simulate the behaviour of a component. After validation against experimental test results, the component-based connection model was incorporated into a system-level numerical model for a series of prototype CCBFs. Through nonlinear static and dynamic structural analyses, the seismic behaviour and collapse prevention performance of CCBFs were studied. When loaded in tension, the brace connections deformed much more than the brace, and amplifying the design force by 1.5 was effective in reducing the seismic deformation demand on brace connections. In some cases, a secondary seismic force-resisting mechanism developed and prevented the system from collapse after the primary seismic force-resisting mechanism had failed

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetSeismic Performance and AnalysisTravaux en français237 207