Morphology of the collateral sulcal complex and discrimination of functional activation during navigation in the parahippocampal gyrus of the human brain
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A comprehensive study of the functional organization of the parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) in the human brain requires a clear understanding of the sulcal-gyral morphology and its variability in individual cerebral hemispheres. This is imperative, given the cytoarchitectonic and functional heterogeneity of the cortical areas that make up the PHG. The collateral sulcal complex comprises a number of sulci that laterally delineate the rostrocaudal extent of the entorhinal cortex and the parahippocampal cortex (PHC) that occupy the surface of the PHG. In non-human primates, the rhinal sulcus refers to a sulcus that laterally delimits the extent of the entorhinal cortex. In contrast, in the human brain, the term rhinal sulcus has been used ambiguously. Some researchers have called a small dimple at the anteriormost part of the PHG the rhinal sulcus, referring to the sulcus laterally bordering the entorhinal cortex as part of the collateral sulcus. This usage of the term rhinal sulcus implies that, in the human brain, the rhinal sulcus bears only a partial relationship with the most anterior part of the entorhinal cortex. In the research carried out for this thesis, the details of the morphology, i.e. the sulcal patterns and variability, of the sulci that make up the collateral sulcal complex are defined in individual subjects on structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) in the standard stereotaxic space of the Montreal Neurological Institute. We found that the anterior sulcal segment of the collateral sulcal complex, which we refer to as the rhinal sulcus, delimits laterally the entorhinal cortex and, posteriorly, the collateral sulcus proper provides the lateral border of the PHC. In addition, we identified a short sulcus, the parahippocampal extension of the collateral sulcus, which runs transversely into the PHG and provides its posterior border. Further caudally, the occipital branch of the collateral sulcus lay in the lingual gyrus of the occipital lobe, bearing no relationship to the PHG. Next, sulcal probability maps were established for the sulci that laterally delineate the PHG (i.e. the rhinal sulcus, collateral sulcus proper, and parahippocampal extension of the collateral sulcus) to aid accurate identification of the sulcal segments and the location of activation peaks in functional neuroimaging studies. Together these anatomical investigations showed that, in the human brain, a sulcus exists that laterally delineates the extent of the entorhinal cortex and that, therefore, this sulcus should be termed the rhinal sulcus, consistent with the non-human primate literature. The level at which the collateral sulcus proper can be separated from the occipital extent of the collateral sulcus may be a potential candidate for a morphological landmark distinguishing the PHC of the medial temporal lobe, involved in mnemonic information processing, from the lingual gyrus of the occipital lobe, involved in processing visual information.The location of functional activation peaks obtained during the performance of a navigation task in a functional MRI (fMRI) study were related to the morphology of the sulcal segments of the collateral sulcal complex that had been identified in the anatomical studies. Based on these morphological studies, it was possible to show that the middle and posterior parts of the PHC, and not the anterior PHC or entorhinal cortex, were involved when scene-selective information necessary for navigation was processed. Moreover, a similar fMRI study in patients with mild traumatic brain injury revealed that such structure-function relationships could aid the identification of subtle consequences on functional activation in the right posterior and left middle PHC. Without a detailed understanding of the sulcal segments of the collateral sulcal complex, the correct interpretation of the activation peaks observed in the fMRI studies in the healthy and clinical populations would not have been possible.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».