Physician experiences and barriers to addressing the social determinants of health in clinical care in the Eastern Mediterranean Region
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: It has been increasingly recognized that social determinants can impact the health of patients and populations. Although there are a growing number of publications and studies about this topic in industrialized countries, relatively little is published in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. In particular, there is little known about how physicians in this region can help to address the underlying social causes of poor health of their patients. The objectives of this study are: 1) To identify common social challenges faced by patients in Eastern Mediterranean countries, 2) To assess what doctors are already doing to address these challenges, 3) To identify barriers and facilitators for addressing the social causes of poor health in the clinical encounter, and 4). To explore the main similarities and differences between doctors' experiences in Eastern Mediterranean countries as compared to the Canadian context where social accountability is increasingly emphasized in medical education and accreditation standards of health care institutions. Methods: We conducted a qualitative research study employing a qualitative descriptive methodology. A maximum variation purposive sampling approach was used to recruit physicians with a wide range of age groups, genders, countries of origin, types of clinical practice and years since training. A snowball technique was also used to identify additional participants. Recruitment continued until data saturation was reached. In total, semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out with 18 doctors who were trained in Eastern Mediterranean countries but have since moved to Canada. In this way, all study participants had in-depth understanding and practical clinical experience as health professionals in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, as well as an awareness of the Canadian health care system and context. All interviews were conducted in English, whether in person or over the phone, and transcribed verbatim. A conventional content analysis was used to analyze the data.Results: According to study respondents, the main social challenges of patients in the Eastern Mediterranean Region include poverty, illiteracy, domestic violence, unstable families, and food insecurity. Doctors there have attempted to help their patients by providing free medical services and free medications, establishing a donation box for underprivileged patients and referring to social workers, where available. Barriers to addressing social determinants in this context include cultural constraints, lack of time, unfamiliarity or unavailability of social support organizations, shortages of family doctors, and lack of formal training in how to address social determinants of health. Study participants acknowledged that Canadian health care providers have greater access to a wide range of social support resources, a better developed social security network for patients living with disadvantage, and increasingly more training and awareness about the social determinants of health and social accountability role than in their countries of origin. Conclusions: Most study participants expressed their willingness to help patients in dealing with social challenges, and shared their experiences of tackling such issues, though there were also important barriers reported that would need to be overcome. Participants suggested that better addressing social challenges in clinical care within the Eastern Mediterranean context would require educating both doctors and patients about the importance of discussing the patient's social environment as part of the clinical encounter, as well as advocating for broader policy approaches by governments to address the underlying structural causes of widespread social challenges.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».