Employment and individuals with disabilities in Québec: A multi-study investigation of barriers and needs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Individuals with disabilities face inequities in various aspects of life, including employment. In the province of Québec, merely 40% of individuals with disabilities are employed, compared to 73% of the general population (Camirand, Dugas, Cardin, Dubé, Dumitru, & Fournier, 2010). The purpose of this multi-study dissertation was to utilize a Disabilities Studies Lens (Williams & Mavin, 2012) and Social Cognitive Career Theory (Lent, Brown, & Hackett, 1994) to explore employment barriers, coping efficacy, and employment facilitators of people with disabilities living in Québec. In the first study, the Barriers to Employment and Coping Efficacy Scale (Corbière, Mercier, & Lesage, 2004) was used to measure employment barriers and coping efficacy of 108 individuals with and without disabilities. Independent t-tests revealed that while individuals with disabilities perceived a significantly higher number of employment barriers, their coping efficacy was equivalent to thatof participants without disabilities. The second study sought to identify employment facilitators for individuals with disabilities. Three open-ended questions were presented to 10 participants with visible disabilities and 11 participants with invisible disabilities. Responses were analyzed using inductive content analysis and revealed that while participants with visible disabilities were more likely to express the need for physical accessibility and job design needs, the invisible disability group emphasized the need for a supportive and empowering work environment as well as job design needs. The final study utilized transcendental phenomenology (Moustakas, 1994) to explore the lived experiences of four individuals with invisible disabilities in the context of employment. Emerging themes included experiencing a lack of understanding in theworkplace, wanting a supportive, inclusive work environment, the importance of having a job consistent with one's assets and needs, and disability acting as a catalyst for individual development. Together, the findings of these studies shed light on the important role that the environment plays in either facilitating or hindering employment opportunities for people with disabilities in Québec, as well as the differing experiences and needs of workers with visible and invisible disabilities. This research has implications for the development of specialized supported employment programs, as well as for the improvement of workplace accessibility.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».