The pragmatic archivist: An exploration of information management in K-12 independent schools
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The archival records of primary and secondary schools are valuable sources of information that could support their institutions’ administrative and curricular activities, as well as the collective memory and identities of their community members, but only when they are captured, made accessible, and preserved. As archival management is perceived as extraneous to a school’s core function of educating students, recordkeeping is not always prioritized. This disregard can lead to ad-hoc, decentralized, or non-existent information management strategies, which in turn leads to knowledge not being shared or captured, and records not being preserved. Both the school and its archive suffer. This research explored the nature and purpose of information and records within K-12 independent schools and established connections between different organizational variables and information management.Research is sparse on the management of primary and secondary school archives, and even less touches on independent schools specifically. The primary objective of this research was to examine the state of information management in K-12 independent schools in Quebec, Canada from an archival perspective. It explored the different types of records that are created or acquired by K-12 school archives (as well as those that are not), the information management needs of these schools, the organizational variables that could be important regarding information management in schools, and the role of school archivists.This was a case study of a single school, which included three different data collection methods: a document analysis to understand how the school’s records were managed; interviews with administrators to learn about the records they create and information they need; and a faculty survey to see how their informational practices and requirements compared with the administrative staff. The case study was followed by interviews with archivists from similar schools to gather their perspectives as well as to see if any of the themes that had been uncovered would be present in other institutions.The data clearly demonstrated that, in the case study school, information management was not always prioritized, and as such, administrative staff, teaching faculty, and the school’s archival collection suffered. Organizational information tended to be shared most effectively between small departments and close colleagues without the benefit of strong centralized information management policies and procedures. The school archivists interviewed tended to be under-resourced, under-supported, and inundated by the magnitude and scope of their responsibilities. The management of the school’s digital records was specifically an area of concern. A functional analysis was completed that detailed many of the different records that independent K-12 schools create or acquire and should be retained by their archive. It also included an examination of some of the appraisal and accession, use and access, and management and preservation considerations that should be addressed. Ten ‘moments of failure’ were then identified that could lead to gaps in a school’s archive. This was followed by an examination of some of the information management needs of a K-12 independent school, which led to an analysis of six organizational variables that could be important regarding information management programs in schools. Finally, it argued that, especially as business records have embraced the digital, the role and positioning of school archivist must be revisited to remain relevant and effective
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,034 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,009 | 0,014 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,040 | 0,078 |
| Communication savante | 0,027 | 0,011 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,013 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».