MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7161998487 · doi:10.82308/42414

Educational curriculum reform: Exploring the liminal experience of in-service science teachers

2020· dissertation· en· W7161998487 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather McPherson

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueInnovative Education and Learning Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLiminalityReflexivityCurriculumScholarshipProfessional developmentProfessional learning communityParticipant observationSituatedTeacher educationTransformative learningEthnography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 2001, the province of Québec introduced the Québec Education Program (QEP) reform curriculum. The changes introduced in the curriculum were sweeping in scope. For the first time, provincial policy documents encouraged teachers to incorporate critical thinking strategies into their lessons. These critical thinking strategies placed inquiry-based learning and problem-based learning approaches into a competency-based educational framework. However, successful QEP implementation would have required extensive in-service teacher education that incorporated these pedagogies. Unfortunately, many Québec teachers had and still have limited access to high-quality professional development (PD). Existing scholarship suggests that many science teachers remain unprepared and uninformed to implement the reform curriculum fully. This dissertation is a critical ethnographic and autoethnographic exploration of how science teachers collaborate and develop their professional practices as they work in a professional learning community (PLC). The overarching goal of this doctoral study was to explore the potential of a yearlong PLC initiative to bridge the liminal space created by the implementation barriers to reform-based science teaching. The study focuses on nine participant teachers (including myself as a co-participant) who met for eight monthly PLC meetings over one school year to collaborate and support each other to enhance their pedagogical practice. The data corpus includes pre- and post-PLC interviews, video-recorded PLC meetings, participants’ reflexive journals, field notes, and reflexive researcher journals. This study draws on two theoretical perspectives, Bourdieu’s social field theory (1977) and Lave and Wenger’s theory of situated learning (1991). Together, these theoretical frameworks suggest that adult learning is a social endeavour where novice teachers learn through close collaboration with experienced teachers. The complex social relationships between novice and experienced teachers provide participants with an opportunity to develop an understanding of their practice, which can shift and give rise to new ways of knowing. As participants struggle to develop professionally within a PLC, there is a potential to transform social practice as participants mutually engage in critical reflection and collaboration, leading to pedagogical innovation as new teaching skills and strategies develop.The findings suggest that when teachers are provided with meaningful opportunities to participate in prolonged PD, they eagerly do so. Participation in a PLC furnished a supportive learning environment for novice and experienced teachers. Teachers benefited professionally from the opportunity to experiment with and develop inquiry-based learning and problem-based learning strategies. Findings also reveal that too little is being done to support novice teachers during the critical induction years. This dissertation outlines a collaborative partnership between university researchers and high school teachers that helped to translate research on science education into practice. The empirical work with science teachers contributes to the existing literature on PLCs through an in-depth analysis of how a PLC generates and sustains teacher professional growth. Currently, there is a dearth of literature studying the assumptions that guide PLCs, their potential to support pedagogical innovation and the learning processes that transpire in PLCs. This research outlines recommendations for educational stakeholders – school boards, governments and faculties of education on teacher PD. This investment in continued PD is crucial if the educational system is to achieve its goal of sustaining teachers who are knowledgeable, skilled, and effective

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,336
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,128
Tête enseignante GPT0,441
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetInnovative Education and Learning PracticesTravaux en français237 207