Assessing the impacts of the Quebec primary care enrolment policies on patient-physician affiliation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Patients’ relationships with, and affiliation to, primary care physicians can influence patients’ care experience, continuity of care and health outcomes. Many Canadian provinces are actively trying to increase the number of patients who have a regular medical doctor through patient-physician enrolment policies. In Quebec, two enrolment policies were introduced, one for the chronically ill and elderly in 2003 and one for the general population in 2009. While the association between having a regular primary care provider and better health outcomes is well established, we know less about the impact of enrolment policies on attributes of the patient-physician relationship.In this thesis, the primary goal was to evaluate the impact of primary care enrolment policies on measurable attributes of the patient-physician relationship. I focused on measuring the impacts of Quebec enrolment policies on aspects of patient-physician relationships that could be plausibly affected by enrolment and measured using health administrative data (HAD). This included the proportion of visits with the physician seen most that year and whether patients self-reported having a regular medical doctor. The first is directly available in HAD while the latter is not. In manuscript 1, I explore predictive modeling methods that can be used to predict patients’ report of having a RMD. The Canadian Community Health Survey has respondents’ answers to whether they have a RMD, but HAD does not. With linked data, I built predictive models for responses using data only available in the HAD. I used Random forests, a machine learning technique, in addition to conventional statistical models. In manuscript 2, I compare the prediction performance of the different methods identified in manuscript 1 for predicting whether patients have a RMD in HAD. This includes comparisons to the usual provider continuity index (UPC), the conventional measure of patient affiliation in HAD. Once I established that HAD could be used to accurately predict self-reporting having a RMD, I identified which predictors in the models were most important. By identifying the most important predictors, I was able to create a simple index that is highly predictive and can easily be applied by other health services researchers. This new measure is the Reporting a Regular Medical Doctor Index (RRMD). In manuscript 3, I evaluate the impacts of the Quebec enrolment policies on patient affiliation to a primary care provider, using both UPC and the RRMD index. I use a difference-in-difference analysis to evaluate the 2003 vulnerable enrolment policy and an interrupted-time-series to evaluate the 2009 general enrolment policy. For both policy evaluations, I found no evidence that the enrolment policies impacted patient-physician affiliation.The findings presented in this work offers valuable evidence on the effect of enrolment policies on patient-physician affiliation that can be used to inform future interventions aimed at increasing patient-provider affiliation. The new RRMD measure that predicts whether a person reports having a RMD using only HAD will be useful for both researchers and government institutions to evaluate the impacts of policy interventions on this health systems indicator
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,043 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».