Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus retention and dynamics in plant litter, surface and deep soil of intact, restored and drained inland freshwater marshes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In response to widespread wetland degradation in the past century, multiple restoration programs are ongoing throughout Canada, aiming to regain important wetland functions. After decades of restoration practices, despite rewetted and revegetated, it is under debate if their key biogeochemical functions and features (e.g., microbial activity, the carbon and nutrients retention in sediment) have recovered successfully. This thesis investigated intact and short and long term restored inland freshwater marshes and their carbon, nutrient retention and dynamics in the ecosystem. I especially focused on the decomposing litter, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in surface soil, and the carbon and nutrients distribution and stoichiometric patterns in the deep soil profile.Across three wetland restoration sites in Manitoba and Ontario, litter decomposition rate was controlled by litter species and wetland characteristics especially the hydrologic regimes and surrounding land uses, not the intact or restored classes. The nutrients dynamic in litters was determined by both initial litter quality and surrounding human disturbances (e.g., sewage inputs to marshes), and achieved a steady stoichiometric balance for all sites at the end of the decomposition experiment. In a reserve site in Ontario, comparison of an intact and a restored marsh showed consistent spatial variability in microbial biomass and enzyme activities over the landscape transect encompassing the permanently inundated centre, intermittently inundated wet meadow, and never inundated upland. For both marshes, the degree of inundation and dominant plant species mainly determined the surface soil microbial biomass and extracellular enzyme activities, rather than land management or soil properties. Within the soil profiles of thirty-three intact, drained and restored marshes from Manitoba and Alberta, I found the cultivation history and surrounding land uses strongly influenced sediment carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration and stoichiometric features both in surface soils (0-30 cm) and subsoils (30-100 cm). The vertical distribution of elements was highly variable among individual restored marshes and was not distinguished among different restoration age ranges from 2-23 years. Soil stoichiometric features of restored marshes were generally more similar to drained than intact wetlands, indicating a strong cultivation imprint on restored wetland soils.These findings provided science-grounded evidence on the success or failure of duplication of ecosystem carbon and nutrients dynamics and retention in decadal restored freshwater marshes to the adjacent intact conditions. They indicate similar environmental controllers on carbon and nutrients dynamic between intact and restored marsh systems in the surface litter and soil where biological processes dominated, however, alterations in deep sediments related to historical land conversions and physiochemical processes might be unrecoverable. Chronosequence (simply grouping wetlands by restoration age) might not be an adequate approach to delineate the recovery states of wetland functions. Instead, wetland structure (e.g., hydrologic regimes, adapted plant species) and interactions with surrounding or onsite anthropogenic activities (e.g., agriculture) are important on the efficacy of marsh biogeochemical functioning recovery, which should be considered in model development
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».