MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7162038898 · doi:10.82308/14295

The influence of the urban built environment on utilitarian walking and body mass index: Trip diary and longitudinal studies of Canadians

2016· dissertation· en· W7162038898 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rania Wasfi

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueUrban Transport and Accessibility
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBuilt environmentNeighbourhood (mathematics)Urban designGeocodingWalkabilityLevel designPublic transportWork (physics)PopulationHuman factors and ergonomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There is growing interest in developing livable cities with neighbourhoods that encourage active living. The urban built environment including land use, amenities and transportation systems is increasingly expected to provide a variety of benefits including neighborhood walking-friendliness. To date, there have been few long term studies with large population samples that have assessed the relationships between walking-friendliness of places and the level of utilitarian walking (i.e., walking for a specific purpose such as to go to work or to school) in people. Most research to date has relied on cross-sectional study designs and the conclusions of many existing studies are invariably limited owing to problems of self-selection of motivated walkers into walking-friendly neighbourhoods. This dissertation addresses some of the methodological limitations in this research area by measuring utilitarian walking using geographic information system-based estimates in a cross-sectional approach, and by geocoding respondents of a population-based longitudinal survey for quasi-experimental designs to assess the role of urban built environments on utilitarian walking and body weight. My dissertation has produced three key findings: 1. Montreal residents were able to achieve the recommended 30 minutes of physical activity each working day by commuting to work using public transportation. This benefit was greatest for suburban residents who walked approximately 35 to 50 minutes per day to and from commuter train stations, the majority of whom were affluent. Transportation system characteristics had greater influences on walking to public transport than did neighbourhood physical characteristics. 2. Canadians who were exposed over time to highly walkable urban neighbourhoods were more likely to engage in moderate and high utilitarian walking than Canadians with less exposure to highly walkable neighbourhoods. A unit increase in the probability of spending more time in the fourth Walk Score® quartile neighborhoods increased the probability of moderate (increase of 4.0%, 95% C.I. 2.9%, 5.1%) and high utilitarian walking (increase of 7.7%, 95% C.I. 5.8%, 9.7%) compared to those spending the same time in low walkable neighbourhoods (first Walk Score® quartile neighbourhoods). Canadians who moved from neighbourhoods that were less walking-friendly to neighbourhoods of a higher walkability, were 59% (95% CI 3 %-146%) more likely to increase their utilitarian walking than those who moved to neighbourhoods with a similar walkability level. 3. Trajectories of body mass index (BMI - a measure of body weight adjusted for height) of Canadian men varied according to the friendliness of the urban built environment for walking, even after controlling for individual characteristics that influence body weight. Moving to more walkable neighbourhoods (2 Walk Score® quartiles higher), was associated with approximately a one unit (kg/m2) decrease in BMI for men (95% C.I. -1.7,-0.3). There was no detectable influence of neighbourhood walkability on body weight for women. Improving public transport service reliability and neighbourhood walkability have potential to increase utilitarian walking and decrease body mass index in populations, even for those who are otherwise inactive in their leisure time. Planning to construct walkable communities supported by reliable public transport should be considered among public health policies to promote utilitarian walking and reduce overweight and obesity.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,113

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetUrban Transport and Accessibility→Travaux en français237 207→