Fostering happiness among public transit users: Analyzing customer satisfaction surveys through non-traditional approaches
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Customer satisfaction surveys are one of the most heavily utilized tools within the public transit industry to gain insight into the perceptions, attitudes and behaviours of customers. The efficacy of policies and service improvement strategies derived from satisfaction data are presently limited by the methodologies that are used to analyze this data. The overarching goal of this dissertation is to expand the understanding of public transit customer satisfaction through incorporating personal, spatial and contextual factors. This research goal will be achieved through answering the following research question: How can customer satisfaction data be effectively analyzed and utilized to generate targeted service quality improvements? This dissertation consists of four research objectives which are as follows: 1.To show differences in perceptions of service quality across different socioeconomic neighbourhoods in a highly competitive and well-monitored transit market; 2.To develop a transit market segmentation approach that includes personal, spatial and contextual factors; 3.To understand the extent to which transfers influence trip satisfaction; 4.To expand our understanding of how public transit performance measures can be integrated into satisfaction analyses to better predict overall satisfaction.The four research objectives each correspond to an analysis chapter comprising this manuscript-based dissertation. These chapters build on one another, and collectively aim to advance existing methods of analyzing customer satisfaction data for better knowledge of the transit market. The first two chapters of this dissertation present spatial methods of analyzing customer satisfaction data. Chapter two examines satisfaction with bus service across neighbourhoods of varying socio-economic status in London, UK. This spatial method allows agencies to identify areas for improvement at a more disaggregate level than previous research. The third chapter presents a new market segmentation approach that incorporates spatial and contextual factors that have not previously been incorporated into the practice of segmenting the transit market. This new method is demonstrated using a sample of commuter rail users in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, Canada. The remaining two chapters demonstrate how contextual and operational data can be incorporated into satisfaction analyses. Chapter four explores the relationship between transferring and trip satisfaction using a survey of transit commuters to McGill University. In Chapter 5, satisfaction levels among users of a local and a limited-stop bus service in Vancouver, Canada are studied, while controlling for operational characteristics describing the service these users experienced, such as crowding. A concluding chapter consolidates the findings of these chapters and presents policy and research implications to support a better understanding of satisfaction. More specifically, this dissertation contributes to the knowledge in the following four ways:m •Identifies important shortcomings regarding how customer satisfaction data is analyzed; •Develops reproducible methodologies to both integrate spatial data into the analysis of satisfaction levels, as well as to apply spatial analysis techniques to examine satisfaction with service at a local scale (i.e. the route or neighbourhood level); •Demonstrates how detailed trip data can be applied to understand how specific service characteristics influence satisfaction levels; •Shows how transit performance data can be integrated into satisfaction analyses to provide a more complete understanding of passenger satisfaction levels. As customers are the most important judges of service quality, this dissertation demonstrates how transit agencies can more effectively analyze customer perceptions of service as stated in satisfaction surveys and generate policies for service improvements that will have the strongest impact on riders.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».