MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7162073949 · doi:10.82308/14933

The effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications on pain chronification

2022· dissertation· en· W7162073949 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maha Zidan

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAcetaminophenGeneralizability theoryChronic painNonsteroidalCohortAcute painLogistic regression

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background and objective: Analgesics are among the most commonly used over-the-counter medications and NSAIDs or acetaminophen are used as the first-line treatment for chronic pain in Canada. While their pain relief efficacy has been studied, the longer-term effect of taking these medications on pain outcomes, particularly on the transition from acute to chronic pain, remains unclear. We have previously shown that the risk of chronification for acute back pain is particularly enhanced by taking NSAIDs during the acute phase, explained by the dampening of pain resolution through an inflammatory response. To determine the generalizability of the chronification effect of NSAIDs, we investigated the effect of a range of analgesics on body-site specific pain in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) including back pain. Significant findings were tested for replication in another cohort, the UK Biobank (UKB).Design and Methods: Based on the CLSA Comprehensive cohort of 27,765 individuals using both baseline and first follow-up (FU1) data (3 years interval), analyses were conducted on back pain, jaw pain, and knee pain. Individuals at baseline were asked about their experience of pain at each site; for back pain and jaw pain, the referral period was the prior 12 months, while for knee pain, this was during the last 4 weeks and on most of the days, (5,323/2,215/4,862) responded “Yes” respectively. Each pain type was analyzed in separate logistic regression models with site-specific pain as the outcome. Cases were defined as those with site-specific pain at baseline still reporting pain at the same site at FU1(3 years interval) (N= 2,957/946/2,517) and controls as those who had recovered (no pain) (N= 2,366/1,269/2,345). In this study, chronic pain is defined as site-specific pain present at both baseline and FU1. We considered five analgesic classes (NSAIDs, paracetamol, opioids, anti-depressants, and gabapentinoids) as predictors in logistic regression models for each site-specific pain. We tested for association between taking medications and the development of chronic pain, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, intensity of pain, and BMI.We used the nominal p-value threshold of 0.05 to define statistical significance in the CLSA and tested significant findings for replication in the UKB. Specifically, knee pain models were tested for replication. Cases and controls were defined for the CLSA: 7,110 UKB subjects with knee pain who answered “Yes” for having pain that interfered with their usual activities in the last month were included. Individuals who reported knee pain at any of the next visits were considered as cases (3,331), while others who did not report any pain, were considered as controls (recovered) (3,779).Results: In a full model including all medication classes, chronic back pain showed a strong association with taking analgesics for all classes. Back pain subjects taking NSAIDs are at 1.29 times greater risk of developing chronic pain than those not taking NSAIDs (OR = 1.29; P = 0.0035). For knee pain patients, NSAIDs (and no other class) were identified as a risk factor for developing chronic knee pain (OR = 1.35; P = 0.0004). For jaw pain patients, the number of cases was very small. Opioids and antidepressants are associated with chronicity. Replication of knee pain results in the UKB showed that NSAIDs (and no other class) were identified as significant in the full model (OR = 1.15; P = 0.01).Conclusion: Individuals taking NSAIDs for pain are at a higher risk of having chronic pain 2-3 years later, compared to individuals taking other analgesics. These results imply that the detrimental effect of NSAIDs on pain chronicity is independent of reported pain bodily site and stage of pain. Modifications to NSAID indications are warranted

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,055
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,109

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation→Travaux en français237 207→