Land East of Firsfield Farm, Bardwell, Suffolk: Results of a Heritage Assessment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This report presents the results of a heritage assessment that was carried out by South West Archaeology Ltd. (SWARCH) prior to the proposed development of a c.90ha PV development on land east of Firsfield Farm, Bardwell, Suffolk. This phase of archaeological works also considered the route of the c.10km cable which would connect the site to the grid. The desk-based assessment followed the guidance that is outlined in: Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment (CIfA 2020); and Understanding Place: Historic Area Assessments in a Planning and Development Context (Historic England 2017). The historic visual impact assessment followed the guidance that is outlined in: Conservation Principles: Policies and Guidance for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment (English Heritage 2008); The Setting of Heritage Assets (Historic England 2017); Seeing History in the View (English Heritage 2011); Visual Assessment of Wind Farms: Best Practice (University of Newcastle 2002); and Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment: 3rd Edition (Landscape Institute 2013). The proposed development would cover an area of c.90ha within the Euston Estate on land that formed a part of Bardwell Heath until its enclosure during the second quarter of the 19th century. The cable route would cross Barningham Park, skirt the northern edge of Euston Park, and cross agricultural fields to the south and to the west of Barnham. The walkover survey identified a limited number of possible earthwork features, possible broad depressions, and possible traces of ridge and furrow. The archaeological potential of the site is low, with the exception of a possible Late Prehistoric or Romano-British settlement site in Field 03. The proposed cable route would cross enclosed agricultural land with proven archaeological potential, with excavated evidence for Prehistoric, Romano-British, and Anglo-Saxon activity. The archaeological potential of the proposed cable route, in particular towards the western end, is considered to be high, with a high probability of encountering Prehistoric and Anglo-Saxon settlement remains. There are proposals for additional PV developments within the surrounding area and, whilst a single PV development will have a negligible to negative/minor impact, the cumulative impact of multiple PV developments would be raised to negative/moderate. With this in mind, the overall impact of the proposed development can be assessed as negligible to negative/minor. The impact of the proposed development on any buried archaeological resource may be permanent and irreversible, though this can be mitigated through an appropriate programme of archaeological monitoring and recording.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».