Methods for creating a portrait of outcomes in pediatric rare diseases: An example from pediatric Multiple Sclerosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is estimated that more than 55 million people live with a diverse array of diseases that are considered rare. Because of the rarity, little is known about its impact on a child’s life. Families of children with rare diseases are concerned with not having sufficient information about the disease course, treatment options and outcomes. Apart from survival, families are most concerned about the child’s quality of life (QOL). A key challenge is a lack of condition specific QOL measures to quantify the impact of treatment and disease. Instead, generic measures of health-related quality of life (HRQL) are used to infer QOL. The rarity of the disease poses many challenges related to sample size and heterogeneity. To overcome these challenges, integration of multiple data sources is the most feasible option. This approach is called the Multiple Data Integration Approach (MEDIA). Therefore, the overall objective of this PhD thesis is to describe methods for creating a portrait of outcomes of a rare disease from integrating different sources of data, using an example in pediatric MS. As there is currently no condition-specific measure of QOL in pediatric MS, our first step was to develop one. To develop a measure of QOL, a qualitative synthesis was conducted, and a framework of pediatric QOL was purposed (Manuscript 1). When generic measures are used as outcomes, cultural differences can confound the effect of the health condition on the total score. The problem is magnified in rare diseases because participants are often recruited worldwide. A potential solution was to estimate a global score in typically developing children as a reference and estimate the adjustments needed to consider cultural and regional effects (Manuscript 2). A systematic review was also conducted to identify QOL outcome measures in pediatric MS and to estimate a global score (Manuscript 3) among children and adolescents with MS. Results showed scores were the same as typically developing peers. This suggested that MS has minimal impact on a child’s life and raised the question of whether generic measures were capturing the domains of life important to children and adolescents with MS and their families. In Manuscript 4, relevant domains of life were identified through an online survey and the Heck-Laurin Pediatric MS measure was developed. Manuscripts 5 and 6 used existing data. Manuscript 5 used the Multiple Sclerosis Outcomes Assessment Consortium database, with data arising from MS clinical trials. Group-based trajectory modeling was conducted to identify patterns of disability progression in 676 young people with MS. Performance of two groups of people with MS, were compared (18 to 25 years old and 26 to 35 years old) using linear mixed models. Results showed that disability progression was stable, with about 25% of people with impairments in gait and hand function. These results indicated that young people with an earlier onset have a different course of disability progression. Manuscript 6 was from the National Rehabilitation Reporting System on young people with MS who need inpatient rehabilitation. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify the disability profiles of young people with MS at admission to Canadian rehabilitation facilities and discharge. At admission, approximately 20% of young people with MS were incontinent and dependent in mobility and self-care. This proportion was much higher in the younger group (16 to 25 years). The use of MEDIA allowed for the generation of new knowledge on QOL and HRQL, identification of important and relevant long- and short-term disability outcomes in pediatric MS, and a better understanding of disability progression in young people with MS. This thesis illustrated the feasibility of MEDIA and contributed evidence towards solutions for overcoming challenges when conducting research in rare disease populations. MEDIA could be adapted to other rare disease populations to generate new knowledge
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,062 | 0,104 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».