Distributed Fibre Optic Sensing (DFOS) for Dam Breach Verification (DBV)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summary The application of Distributed Fibre Optic Sensing (DFOS) in dam safety particularly for Dam Breach Verification (DBV) represents a paradigm shift from traditional, reactive approaches to a more predictive, data-driven framework for structural health monitoring. By leveraging continuous, real-time, and spatially distributed data across the dam body, DFOS enables early detection of anomalies with unmatched precision. It transcends the limitations of conventional point-based instrumentation, offering full-length coverage of critical zones, including foundations, cores, galleries, and downstream filters. The integration of DFOS with SCADA systems and Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) further strengthens its value by enabling automated, actionable alerts in breach or deformation scenarios. Key to this capability is Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (OTDR), which allows for pinpointing the exact location of fibre breaks or deformation zones within a 1to 2 meters of margin, providing crucial lead time for emergency intervention. Moreover, the paper demonstrates how multi-modal sensing through DTS (for seepage), DSS (for deformation), and DAS (for acoustic erosion detection) supports a comprehensive, layered safety system that can detect both progressive and sudden failure mechanisms. This fusion of technologies makes DFOS not just a breach detection system, but a holistic surveillance solution for water-retaining structures. From a design and implementation perspective, DFOS offers versatility and scalability. It can be effectively retrofitted into existing dams during rehabilitation or seamlessly integrated during the construction phase of new dams. Real-world deployments in varied geographies Australia, Sweden, Canada, and the United States have validated its long-term reliability, even under harsh environmental conditions. These projects underscore DFOS’s robustness, high uptime, and resilience in large-scale applications such as tailings storage facilities (TSFs), embankments, and hydropower dams. Critically, DFOS also introduces operational and economic efficiencies. Fibre cables require no active power along their length, are immune to electromagnetic interference, and can serve multiple sensing functions using different interrogator units making the system both durable and cost-effective. Maintenance requirements are minimal, and system redundancy (e.g., dual-loop installations) further enhances reliability. In conclusion, DFOS-based DBV systems offer a technologically mature, field-proven, and highly adaptable solution for modern dam surveillance. Their role as the “last line of defense” is invaluable in emergency management, but their real strength lies in transforming dam safety into a proactive and intelligent discipline. DFOS empowers dam owners and authorities to move from post-failure analysis to pre-failure prevention, fulfilling regulatory mandates, protecting downstream populations, and ensuring sustainable infrastructure management for decades to come. Key Word: #DistributedFibreOpticSensing, #DFOS, #DamBreachVerification, #DBV, #DamSafety, #Dams, #SeepageMonitoring, #StrainMonitoring, #DTS, #DSS, #DAS, #StructuralHealthMonitoring, #EarlyWarningSystems, #FloodRiskManagement, #EmbankmentDams, #RealTimeMonitoring, #InfrastructureResilience, #SmartDams, #OpticalTimeDomainReflectometry, #XSeepT, #HECRAS #EAP, #EmergencyActionPlan, #TSFMonitoring, #GeotechnicalEngineering, #HydraulicStructures, #DamBreach
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».