MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7162101864 · doi:10.5284/1142458

Barn at the Old Rectory Old Bury Road Alpheton Sudbury, Suffolk: Level 2 Historic Building Recording

2025· article· en· W7162101864 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fraser White

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchaeology Data Service · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlan (archaeology)PhotographyRecord keepingFloor planThursdayDigital photographyHistorical recordSet (abstract data type)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Level 2 Building Record The historic building recording comprises a Level 2 record as set out in the Historic England guidance 'Understanding Historic Buildings: A Guide to Good Recording Practice' (2016). It is required in Condition 15 of planning permission DC/24/00574. Site Visit A site visit was completed on the 9th July 2025, this consisted of three main elements: a drawn, a photographic and a written record. Particular attention is paid to evidence of the former use of the building, and any evidence relating to the primary or historic use was recorded and interpreted to inform the overall understanding of the building. Drawn record The drawn record is based on existing plans provided by the client. This element includes items 2-3 of the Historic England guidance regarding 'the drawn record'. According to the Historic England Guidance a Level 2 record will typically consist of: sometimes item 1 or 2 and sometimes one or more of items 3-7. The drawings include a floor plan and elevations (Fig. 6). It also records the form and location of any structural features and/or detail of historic significance including any evidence for former fixtures and fittings. The existing measured elevations and floor plans with photo location points have been used to illustrate the report and have been checked for accuracy. Photographic record A digital photographic record has been compiled. Photography has been undertaken with a Canon 600D 20mpx TTL digital camera, in accordance with items 1, 2 and 4 of the Historic England guidance (HE 2016). The photographic record includes general views of the building, shots of the external appearance and the overall appearance of principal spaces and functional areas. Specific architectural details that relate to date, alteration, or function have been subject to more detailed photographic recording. Where surviving, external or internal detail (structural or decorative) relevant to the building's design, development and use has been photographed, with scale where appropriate. The photographic survey comprises digital images of the building and specific features of interest. Selected images have been converted to .jpeg format for use in the report. Appropriate levels of Metadata will be maintained and included in the digital archive following the approach set out in the aforementioned guidance. Appropriate scales are located in most archive photographs. However, where appropriate (i.e. where scaling can be seen from items within the view, or shots that may be used in publications), photographs without scales have also been taken. Written record The Level 2 written record is descriptive in its composition and includes the building location, the dates of the record and the name of the recorder. The written record is intended to supplement and support the other elements of the recording to provide an external and internal description of the building in terms of its architecture, setting, construction, development and use. The written record includes a brief summary of the building's historic and architectural context, based upon the site inspection and the historic research. This record includes the location of the building, a detailed description of the exterior and interior of the Building, and important features such as fixtures and fittings. The components of the written record are in-line with Items 1-3, 6 of the Historic England guidance (HE 2016). Historic research A programme of historic research was undertaken to enhance overall understanding of the history and development of the Building. This has been informed by secondary sources consulted at the Suffolk Archives and the Suffolk County Council Historic Environment Record (HER) as well as accessible published online sources. The report includes a map regression to illustrate the development of the building.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,494
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,063
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchaeology Data ServiceMême sujetHistorical Architecture and UrbanismTravaux en français237 207