MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7162135624 · doi:10.82308/47847

Migrants Living with HIV: Exploring Barriers to HIV Care Engagement and an Approach to Address Challenges Beyond Diagnosis

2024· dissertation· en· W7162135624 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anish Arora

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChampionPsychological interventionPublic healthMultidisciplinary approachHealth careQualitative researchHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PopulationPopulation health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Migrants living with HIV (MLWH) are a rapidly growing population in countries affiliated with the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Across OECD countries, MLWH have poorer health outcomes compared to their non-migrant counterparts. Research on the barriers and facilitators to care for MLWH in OECD countries has centered on HIV testing. Concurrently, to champion an equity-focused response to eliminating HIV and AIDS as public health threats, HIV scholars and organizations have called for developing, evaluating, and scaling targeted clinical interventions specifically for MLWH. To respond to these calls, a new approach to caring for MLWH in Montreal, Canada, has been piloted in a multidisciplinary clinic since 2020. Specifically, “the ASAP study” provides MLWH with free antiretroviral therapy (ART), on-site and rapidly (i.e., within 7 days of being linked to care).Objectives: The specific objectives of this doctoral thesis are to: (1) systematically review the barriers and facilitators MLWH in OECD countries encounter beyond diagnosis; (2) investigate the patient-reported experiences and outcomes of MLWH enrolled in ASAP through qualitative and quantitative methods; and (3) explore HIV-related clinical outcomes and the effect of social determinants of health on these outcomes for MLWH enrolled in ASAP.Methods: To address these objectives, I conducted: a systematic mixed studies review (protocol published in BMJ Open, and results published in AIDS Patient Care & STDs); a longitudinal qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with MLWH enrolled in ASAP (manuscript published in the Journal of Personalized Medicine); a quantitative analysis encompassing descriptive statistics and linear mixed modelling for patient-reported outcome and experience measures among MLWH enrolled in ASAP (manuscript under review in AIDS Research and Therapy); and a quantitative analysis involving descriptive statistics and survival analyses on HIV-related clinical outcomes, and the effect of social determinants on these outcomes for MLWH enrolled in ASAP (manuscript published in HIV Medicine).Results: Manuscripts 1 and 2: MLWH experience numerous challenges that impede their initial linkage to and sustained engagement with HIV care and treatment, and ultimately their HIV viral suppression. In particular, not meeting basic needs such as housing and food, or not having stable and secure finances, occupation, or immigration status can lead to disengagement with HIV services among MLWH. However, in this review, providing MLWH with multidisciplinary care was identified as a facilitator to sustained engagement with HIV services. Manuscript 3: Receiving humanizing, holistic, and empowering care from a multidisciplinary team, alongside free ART rapidly, were identified as highly positive elements in the HIV care experience of MLWH, and seemed to motivate their HIV self-management and encourage sustained engagement with care. However, throughout their time in care, MLWH expressed that they continued experiencing complex psycho-social challenges. Manuscript 4: MLWH reported highly positive experiences and outcomes around their HIV care and treatment but continued to report high levels of psychological distress throughout their time engaged in care. Manuscript 5: On median, MLWH enrolled in ASAP were able to initiate ART and reach HIV viral undetectability within 5 (range: 0-50) and 57 days (range: 5-365), respectively. Those who took significantly longer to initiate ART: were less than 35 years old; identified as heterosexual; had less than university-level education; or were unemployed. No social determinant was found to significantly affect time to undetectability.Conclusion: This doctoral thesis contributes timely findings towards understanding the healthcare experiences and outcomes of MLWH. Notably, MLWH experience tremendous multifaceted barriers across each step of the HIV Care Cascade. However, preliminary evidence supports an approach to care grounded in aspects of patient-centred care (e.g., the provision of humanizing and empowering services), with the provision of free ART dispensed on-site and rapidly, to facilitate ART initiation, sustain HIV care engagement, and efficiently reach HIV viral undetectability among MLWH. However, these services appear insufficient for thoroughly addressing the mental health needs of MLWH. Concurrently, ART initiation appears to be influenced by social determinants. This suggests the importance of embedding dedicated, well-funded, and accessible mental health support in HIV clinical settings, and further considering the impact of social determinants of health when designing clinical interventions for more equitable outcomes

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,072
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,101
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,382

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0720,101
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,003
Bibliométrie0,0060,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,004
Communication savante0,0060,010
Science ouverte0,0020,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,077
Tête enseignante GPT0,349
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→Travaux en français237 207→