MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7162187411 · doi:10.59236/emro.v25i2a7935

Drunk on Too Much Life

2023· article· W7162187411 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bryan J. Sajecki

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2023
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueFilm in Education and Therapy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMeaning (existential)NarrativeTone (literature)Mental illnessStigma (botany)GazeBlamePersonal narrative

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Distributed by New Day Films, 350 North Water Street Unit 1-12, Newburgh, NY 12550; 888-367-9154Produced by Michelle Melles and Pedro Orrego, Parallel Vision PicturesDirected by Michelle Melles2021, Streaming, 77 mins Psychosis is terrifying to imagine; hearing voices, seeing visions, believing self-created narratives that are anything but true. Within the sphere of mental illness, it is incredibly difficult to treat, usually combining a cocktail of medications with an assortment of different therapies. Beyond that, the stigma surrounding the diagnosis and condition can be suffocating and altogether exclusionary and harmful. In a general sense, unless a person has been in the shoes of another, they can only scratch the surface of understanding how something feels. And for the affected person, they are more than likely desperate to make meaning of it themselves. What does it all mean? Is this real? Will it go away? Drunk on Too Much Life is a documentary that seeks to reimagine the definition of madness and the understanding of mental illness. It is incredibly unique in that the director, Michelle Melles, has a personal connection to the project, as the film’s main player is her daughter, Corinna. At the onset, the tone is heavy and oppressive, as the viewer watches an emerging adult trapped in her own fears of spiraling into an episode, shaking while she sleeps amidst a catatonic plunge. That fear is very real for her because she has been there before. It is like a dark passenger that creepily follows a few paces behind, whispering when she gets a bit too far for its liking. Despite the whispers, Corinna has a plan; she wants to understand her condition and figure out how to harness it. Perhaps it can be leveraged like a superpower, or a gift? And going further, who is going to stop her from trying? Like a myriad of films before it, the subject of the limitations of psychotropics as a magic bullet is discussed. This conversation occurs throughout, as Corinna meets several supporters that become companions on the journey. With the help of her family, she embraces holistic approaches to treating her condition, such as poetry, music, and art. These provide a necessary catharsis, as she uses the mediums to speak the words she cannot find to describe her feelings. The viewer can see the light in her eyes as she sings (even if she is off key) and hear the power in her voice when she recites a prose poem. Ultimately, she wants to control her “superpowers” so she can help her peers in this battle, demonstrating how pure her heart is. The film smartly uses animated collages to transition between scenes, often including one of Corinna’s songs or stanzas to continue telling the story even in a break of sorts. It also serves as a much needed aesthetic to break up the heavy undertones of the subject matter. Family pictures are also used to enhance the story, showing the chronology of Corinna’s life through her descent into madness. Additionally, interviews with psychologists and with those who also live with the dark passenger provide a sense of hope and understanding. Their contextual expertise helps to shed light on the belief that this condition can be harnessed because they have done it or assisted others in the task. Drunk on Too Much Life is a poignant documentary that provides a distinct point of view regarding psychology and mental illness that others before it have failed to do. It destroys any sense of stigma and any viewer is surely better for it. This film will be a strong addition to any academic library, especially one with a strong health science, mental health, or social work background. Awards:Official Selection, Social Change Film Festival (Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles), 2022; Official Selection, Mental Filmness Festival (Chicago), 2022; Official Selection, Rendezvous With Madness Festival, Closing Night Film, Toronto, 2021; Quarter Finalist, ReelAbilities Film Festival, New York, 2022; The Gold Medal, The Creative School, Toronto Metropolitan University, 2021; Merit of Awareness (Honorable Mention) - Awareness Film Festival 2022

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,634
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0490,101

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,290
Tête enseignante GPT0,523
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEducational Media Reviews OnlineMême sujetFilm in Education and TherapyTravaux en français237 207