Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Distributed by Good DocsProduced by Carmen Vincent and Heidi ReinbergDirected by Carmen Vincent2022, Streaming, 28 mins Thomas Felter, the father of Emily a young person with Down Syndrome, has tailored a training for first responders titled "Emily Talk", emphasizing the significance of exercising patience in their interactions with individuals with disabilities; he himself is a first responder. Upon hearing numerous accounts of first responders making rash decisions and forming judgments regarding individuals with disabilities, resulting in avoidable tragedies like the death of Ethan Saylor, who like Emily had down Syndrome, Tom Felter became motivated to take action. This short 30-minute documentary shows some of that training, but more importantly, it shows Emily in her day-to-day interactions with her family, living, loving, and sometimes using pretty colorful language. She is portrayed in the film, not as someone to pity, but as someone who has a multifaceted personality, a sense of humor, and who has good days and bad days- like all of us. A notable aspect of the documentary is the family and Vincent's willingness to candidly portray challenging moments when their efforts to communicate with their daughter prove to be unsuccessful. Sometimes uncomfortable to watch, but necessary to get a full look into what it is like for the Felter's to parent Emily. We see the family use the term "Emily's Time" for when Emily wants to do something, when she wants to do it, on her own timeline. This in the disability studies field could also be referred to as crip time. And the examples shown, like her impromptu trip to Red Robin, illustrates this use of crip time. At times it also shows that even Tom as the "expert" needs reminding on how to best interact with Emily, and to exude some patience himself. During one Emily Talk, he gets frustrated at Emily for not understanding her, and Emily's mom chimes in with "Let her be, practice what you preach." This documentary can be an educational resource to first-responders, or anyone who would need to be able to communicate with people with disabilities, especially in emergency situations. It could also ignite thoughtful conversations about disability, inclusivity, fairness, and access in disability studies, psychology, social work, and teacher prep programs. There are a few instances of adult language. The film is appropriate for public and academic library collections. Awards:Canadian Shorts Film Festival, 2022 Winner Award of Excellence; Prospector International Film Festival,2022 Winner Best Documentary Short; Stockholm City Film Festival, 2022 Winner Best Documentary Short
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».