MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7162215430 · doi:10.59236/emro.v25i8a8049

Price of Cheap

2023· article· W7162215430 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deborah Bauder

Notice bibliographique

RevueEducational Media Reviews Online · 2023
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCaribbean history, culture, and politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPovertyGovernment (linguistics)Parallel universePoor peopleEntertainment

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Distributed by Collective Eye Films, 1315 SE 20th Ave. #3, Portland OR 97214; 971-236-2056Produced by Kim Carter, Zabi Yaqeen, and Paul Cadieux; Wishing Step PicturesDirected by Barry Stevens2021, Streaming, 79 mins Chattel slavery may be (mostly) a thing of the past but modern-day slavery is still booming in places where poverty flourishes. For those to whom this comes as a surprise, welcome to the reality of the global fashion industry, which fuels a huge demand for cotton and textiles around the world. In the case of South India, where Canadian Director Barry Stevens’ documentary film The Price of Cheap takes place, there are over a thousand textile mills and more than 100,000 girls and young women toiling away in slavery conditions every day. The Price of Cheap takes an unflinching look at the cost that global appetites for fast fashion have on the lives of young people in poverty who are suffering to satisfy them. Using a combination of personal interviews, voiceover shots of people in action, and conversations with experts, educators, and human rights advocates, this film deftly provides entry into an alternate universe most people know very little about. Considerable time is spent following one man in particular, Mr. Joseph Raj, as he works tirelessly to rescue underage girls and children from bondage. There are striking images of scenery, people, and vivid colors throughout, and the film’s visuals are so arresting they occasionally cause the viewer to forget the dire conditions they’re actually showing us. Safety issues, harassment, accidents, and appalling injuries and deaths are a regular part of this landscape, and the film does not shy away from capturing a thorough account of this. However, there is also hope in the form of schools and people like Mr. Raj who are trying to help. Those few young women (and sometimes boys) who escape to something better have aspirations beyond their difficulties, and listening to them speak about their hopes and dreams offers some solace to the unnerved viewer of the film. Periodically intercut with the more standard documentary features are animated scenes dramatizing unsettling events and conversations experienced by the young workers. These are highly effective in drawing viewers into a more intimate understanding of the girls’ struggles in the textile mills. In fact, the film might have benefitted from a few more of these perspective-altering animations, as they are successful conveyors of difficult moments. Forced- and child labor are not pleasant subjects, and the awareness that one is likely contributing to it through seemingly benign fashion choices is even more unsettling. That said, The Price of Cheap should be required viewing for every person in the global West (and beyond). An awareness of the slavery conditions of the workers who produce our clothing would likely spur changes towards behaviors less inherently consumptive and damaging to others around the world. As one expert says during the film, people are willing to make changes in their purchasing if they know why and how. This film provides the why in ample measure. The Price of Cheap will be a good selection for courses in environmental justice, fashion, women’s studies, sociology, anthropology, and business. Highly recommended. The film is in English and Hindi dialects, with English closed captions. Awards:Uruvatti International Film Festival 2021, Best Documentary Feature Film Award; Nawada International Film Festival 2021, Best Social Documentary Film; Chagrin Documentary Film Festival 2021, Best International Documentary Award; London Independent Film Awards 2021, Best Documentary Award; Toronto Lift-Off Film Festival 2021, Audience Choice Award; Free Spirit Film Festival 2021, Best Documentary Award; Tiburon International Film Festival 2021, Humanitarian Award; Black Swan International Film Festival 2021, Best Documentary Film Award; Boston Independent Film Awards 2021, Best Documentary Feature Film Award; Tagore International Film Festival 2021, Outstanding Achievement in Documentary Film Award; San Diego International Film Festival 2021, Audience Choice Award; Impact Docs Awards 2022, Award of Merit

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,218
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,392
Écart entre enseignants0,303 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEducational Media Reviews OnlineMême sujetCaribbean history, culture, and politicsTravaux en français237 207