An AI-Driven Architecture for Cross-Domain Data Management in Enterprise Systems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Enterprise ecosystems have undergone an accelerated digital transformation, which has resulted in the exponential creation, fusion and use of multi-domain data, all of which is often heterogeneous. Today's businesses rely on interdependent platforms, such as finance, health care, manufacturing, logistics, cyber security, cloud computing, and intelligent automation. But conventional data management architectures face significant challenges in delivering smooth interoperability, scalability, governance and intelligent decision-making across these distributed spheres. It has become more challenging as cloud-based systems proliferate, microservices architectures grow, Internet of Things (IoT) devices increase, edge computing systems emerge and artificial intelligence (AI) applications become more common. In this context, it becomes critical for enterprises to have the ability to incorporate structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data, along with security, compliance, observability, and real-time analytics, into a cross-domain data management architecture. This paper introduces an architecture which leverages AI technologies such as machine learning, metadata intelligence, semantic interoperability, automated governance, and adaptive orchestration mechanisms for cross-domain data management in enterprise systems, all within a single enterprise data ecosystem. The proposed architecture utilizes AI models to enable automation of data discovery, classification, quality, anomaly detection, predictive governance, and policy enforcement in various areas of enterprise. The proposed framework enables dynamic cross domain interoperability with the help of intelligent metadata catalogs, federated learning mechanisms, API orchestration and cloud-native microservices instead of traditional enterprise data warehouses and/or separate data lake solutions. There are four main layers of the architecture: Data Acquisition Layer, Intelligent Processing Layer, Governance and Security Layer, and Enterprise Intelligence Layer. The Data Acquisition Layer facilitates multi-source ingestion from enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management, IoT sensors, cloud repositories and external APIs. The Intelligent Processing Layer combines machine learning pipelines, semantic mapping engines, natural language processing models, and graph-based knowledge representation and reasoning methods, allowing for intelligent data harmonization and context-awareness. The Governance and Security Layer combines zero-trust security principles, AI-powered threat intelligence, policy-based access rules, and automatic compliance auditing capabilities to provide enterprise-grade data protection. Lastly, with the Enterprise Intelligence Layer, business stakeholders gain real-time analytics, predictive insights, decision support systems, and adaptive visualization tools. The proposed model also helps overcome enterprise-class data management problems such as data silos, inconsistent metadata standards, latency in distributed systems, security issues, lack of observability, and compliance complexity. The architecture provides intelligent orchestration and automation through AI, which increases operational efficiency, data quality, and faster delivery of analytics and minimizes governance overhead. In addition, the framework also puts into practice principles of explainable AI to guarantee transparency in automated decision making processes, a key element for enterprise trust and regulatory compliance. The analysis was done against traditional centralized architectures, federated data systems and cloud based integration models. The experimental results have shown that the proposed architecture with the integration of AI brings about significant enhancements in interoperability efficiency, data accessibility, governance automation, and analytical responsiveness. The framework proved to be more efficient at data integration by 38%, more accurate on metadata by 41% and more accurate on predictive anomaly detection by 46% than enterprise integration systems. Moreover, automated policy enforcement eliminated the compliance management overhead about 35%. In the study, the use of AI-powered observability and intelligent data catalogs is also noted for their ability to drive operational sustainability and enterprise resilience. The future extensions for the architecture also include emerging technologies like generative AI, federated analytics, autonomous data fabrics, and edge intelligence. The result of this research makes important contributions to enterprise information systems, cloud computing, cyber security governance, and intelligent data engineering. The proposed architecture provides a scalable and flexible platform for future enterprise environments aiming at achieving intelligent, secure, and interoperable data management across domains. The study's theoretical and practical value lies in its development of a holistic AI-powered model that can be used to inform digital businesses in an increasingly complex data-rich environment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».