Preventive effect of exercise interventions on sport-related concussion: a systematic review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective To conduct a systematic review of the preventive effect of exercise interventions on sport-related concussions (SRC). Methods Literatures about the preventive effect of exercise interventions on SRC were searched in databases including CNKI, Wanfang data, VIP, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and EBSCO, with the search scope covering from the establishment of the databases to July 22, 2025. The methodological quality of the in-cluded studies was assessed using PEDro Scale, and relevant data were extracted following the PRISMA guide-lines for a systematic review. Results A total of 29 studies were included. Among them, studies with individuals as the analytical unit included 3 892 participants; studies with teams as the analytical unit involved 41 clubs. Participants came from countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, New Zealand, Australia, Canada and Germany. The studies spanned from 2004 to 2025. The scores of PEDro scale was four to eight. Intervention methods comprised traditional neck resistance training, dynamic neck resistance training and injury prevention programs. Traditional neck resistance training (primarily using bodyweight or elastic bands, often involving isometric contractions) typically featured 15 to 35 minutes per session, two to three times per week, for four to 16 weeks. Dynamic neck resistance training (involving multi-plane isometric or isokinetic exercises using specialized equipment) typically featured ten to 40 minutes per session, two to three sessions per week, for six to 14 weeks. Injury prevention programs (incorporating neck exercises before/after routine training, integrating neuromuscular control, balance training, perturbation training and technique optimization) typically featured 15 to 20 minutes per session, two to three sessions per week, for three to nine months in the season. Neck strength gains were most robust across all three intervention types, with dynamic training yielding greater multidirectional strength gains compared to traditional training. Some studies also observed improvements in key head kinematic parameters through exercise interventions, particularly for individuals using injury prevention programs and those with baseline weak neck strength. A small number of randomized controlled trials confirmed that injury prevention programs reduced SRC incidence, demonstrating a dose-response relationship where greater benefits correlated with higher adherence. Conclusion Most studies confirm that exercise interventions are effective on preventing SRC, though some individual studies remain controversial. Standardized, sustained and well-adhered-to exercise interventions can reduce SRC risk, which should be promoted as a primary prevention strategy at the team level.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,033 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,013 | 0,010 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».