Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Problem/Issue and significance: Intimate partner violence [IPV] is a critically urgent public health issue worldwide. Violence and trauma have multiple short- and long-term health effects including pain, which is a complex, highly subjective experience that can have profoundly negative impacts on both “body and soul.” Untreated pain can become chronic and debilitating, leading to a lower quality of life, decreased employment opportunities, and increased mental health concerns. Addressing pain is an important aspect of the health care professional’s role, and the failure to do so can exacerbate existing health disparities and worsen health outcomes. Current approaches to understanding and managing pain are primarily based on a Westernized view of health and illness. Diversity in knowledge and perspectives is missing from clinical practice, nursing education, and research, and is needed to improve pain assessment and management practices. Approach or innovation: While health care practitioners recognize that more holistic approaches to understanding, assessing, and treating pain are required, the significance of women’s chronic pain experiences in the context of IPV has been largely unexplored. This paper proposes the creation of “pain profiles” using an approach that draws of multiple sources of information and types of knowledge to gain new insights and to develop a richer understanding of women’s pain experiences. The unique circumstances and experiences of Indigenous women are used to illustrate the usefulness of the pain profiles as a case in point. In Canada, Indigenous women experience higher levels of violence and trauma as a result of interpersonal violence, historical trauma, and ongoing socio-economic inequities and systemic racism than non-Indigenous women. When Indigenous women seek health care for pain, they often report a lack of culturally safe and appropriate services and are often labeled as “drug-seeking” which can cause further delays or avoiding seeking care. Few existing health services address pain arising from violence and trauma for women, especially services that focus on cultural safety and trauma-and-violence informed care. Lessons and implications: Pain profiles provide a novel and more nuanced approach to understanding, and addressing, pain in women who have experienced violence by using a holistic approach that draws on various perspectives and multiple sources of information, including the women’s own words. This approach may help to guide the implementation of more culturally safe, trauma-and-violence informed health practices and services, strengthen nursing curriculum around pain assessment and management, and help improve the overall well-being and quality of life of all women who have experienced violence. [An updated file with minor revisions was uploaded on 2026-07-03; the Open Collections Usage Statistics were manually modified in 2026-07].
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,018 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,015 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,016 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».