MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7163997138 · doi:10.82465/132

Developing amine chemical structure–activity relationships for carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption and desorption of amine solvents using machine learning models

2025· other· en· W7163997138 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Kufre Boniface Archibong

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen MIND · 2025
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésAmine gas treatingDesorptionSolventCarbon dioxideAbsorption (acoustics)Dissociation (chemistry)Chemical equilibriumCo2 removal

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Selecting amine solvents for industrial post combustion CO2 capture has never been easy. Usually, this process requires conducting a thorough experiment in order to determine the CO2 absorption and desorption activities of the amine solvents such as equilibrium CO2 rich loading, lean loading, initial CO2 absorption and desorption rates, heat of CO2 desorption, and cyclic capacity which depend so much on the structural, physical, and chemical properties of the amine solvents. This experimental process is not only stressful but also expensive, and time consuming. To address these problems, several machine learning models have been developed in this study to predict the CO2 capture activities of amine solvents such as equilibrium CO2 rich loading, lean loading, initial CO2 absorption and desorption rates, heat of CO2 desorption, and cyclic capacity based on their structural, physical, and chemical properties. This was achieved first, by conducting CO2 absorption and desorption experiment for forty (40) different amines strategically selected to cover the various classes of amines such as primary, secondary, tertiary, multi, and cyclic amines. The concentration of the amine solvents was fixed at 2 M/L, the volume of the solvent was also fixed at 100 ml, the absorption and desorption temperatures were fixed at 40 oC and 90 oC respectively, the concentration of CO2 in the feed gas was maintained at 4% while the feed gas flow rate was fixed at 200 ml/min throughout the experiment. The chemical properties, of the amines such as acid dissociation constant (pka) was determined experimentally, the steric hindrance, and electron donating and withdrawing potentials were determined using some suitable correlations developed by Muchan et al. (2024), while physical properties such as density and viscosity were determined by measurement using the anton paar density meter and viscometer respectively. In order to establish the structure – activity, and property – activity relationships, the physical, chemical, and structural properties of the amines were correlated with their CO2 capture activities. Based on the results of these findings, it could be concluded that pka has a strong positive effect on equilibrium CO2 rich loading of amine solvent, viscosity has a weak negative effect on equilibrium CO2 rich loading, the electron donating potential amines has a moderate positive effect on equilibrium CO2 rich loading, the electron withdrawing potential of amines has a strong negative effect on equilibrium CO2 rich loading, the steric hindrance of primary amines has a strong negative effect on the initial CO2 absorption rate, the pka of primary amines has a moderate positive effect on their initial CO2 absorption rate. This trend was found to be consistent with the secondary, tertiary, and cyclic amines apart from the multi amines which might be due to the variations in the chemical structures within this class of amines. However, since each multi amine has multiple pKa depending on the number of amino functional group present, it is suggested that taking a geometric mean of all the pKa for each multi amine might result in a significant correlation with equilibrium CO2 rich loading. At the end of this work, several machine learning models were developed for predicting the CO2 capture activities of amine solvents and the result shows that the equilibrium CO2 rich loading of amine solvents could be predicted using Catboost algorithm with AAD of 0.17% on the test data, the initial CO2 absorption rate of amine solvents could be predicted using Catboost algorithm with AAD of 0.15% on the test data, the CO2 lean loading of amine solvent could be predicted using Catboost algorithm with AAD of 0.28% on the test data, the initial CO2 desorption rate of amine solvents could be predicted using Catboost algorithm with AAD of 0.39% on the test data, the heat of CO2 desorption could be predicted using Catboost with AAD of 0.59% on the test data, while the cyclic capacity of amine solvents could be predicted using Catboost algorithm with AAD of 0.3% on the test data. To validate the equilibrium CO2 rich loading predictive model developed, some amines solvent of 2M concentration loaded at 4kPa CO2 partial pressure which were neither part of the train data nor test data were selected from the literature and fitted into the model. The results of this exercise were discussed in two cases: case1 with R2 value of 0.92 and AAD of 7% suggesting a good fit, and case2 with R2 value of 0.75 and AAD of 50% suggesting lack of good fit. The results from Case 1 show that the model accurately predicted CO₂ rich loading for new amines like HEEAB, 4A1B, DAMP, and TMDA with an AAD of 7%, likely due to their structural similarity to the training and testing data. In contrast, Case 2 revealed poor model performance (R² = 0.75, AAD = 50%) for structurally dissimilar amines, indicating limited generalizability.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,122
Tête enseignante GPT0,329
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen MIND→Travaux en français237 207→