LAND ADJACENT TO THE OLD RECTORY, HARLESTONE ROAD, CHURCH BRAMPTON, NORTHANTS, NN6 8BF (NGR 471805, 265611): ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Preliminary research of primary archives; machine-excavated trial trenches in area of proposed development impact; hand-excavation of features; GNSS survey; digital photographic record In November 2025, two archaeological evaluation trenches (each 10m by 1.8m) were excavated at a proposed building plot in the southwestern part of the village of Church Brampton, Northamptonshire. The plot is situated on the S side of a main thoroughfare (Harlestone Road), facing the 14th century parish church to the NE and adjoining the grounds of a former early 19th century rectory to the N. The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether significant buried archaeological remains, particularly those pertaining to Church Brampton's medieval settlement, would be affected by a proposed development. The evaluation would allow the planning authority's archaeological advisor to decide whether some form of mitigation would be required. Preliminary research of primary documentary archives revealed that the plot, former glebe, was the site of a parsonage homestead from at least the late 16th century until erection of the rectory, while the right of patronage at Church Brampton was first recorded in 1230. The bounds of the c.3.36-acre parsonage homestead were mapped to a reasonable degree of accuracy in 1580 in a wider survey of the village. However, all of the buildings were depicted in 'birds-eye view' form, so their locations today may only be surmised. Three adjoining buildings with dual-pitched roofs with chimneys, appeared to correspond to the site of the proposed new house. Archaeological remains of a building were subsequently encountered in one of the trenches. It consisted of two very substantial, stone-built sill-beam wall foundations (c. 0.6m deep by 0.5-0.69m wide) for a timber-framed superstructure. A rubble floor suggested that it was possibly an outbuilding. A hand-excavated cross-section through the wall foundation revealed construction no earlier than the last decade of the 17th century, but possibly, more likely in the first half of the 18th century. The cross-section also partially revealed a finely constructed, yet undated, flagstone and cobble floor, which may have belonged to an earlier building. This report provides an illustrative and descriptive account of the investigation. It is to be accompanied by an Addendum Report in 2026, once a salvage record of the building's plan has been obtained during ground reduction for the new building.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».