Application of artificial intelligence methods for the designand development of aircraft flight control laws
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The development of flight control systems has always been the main topic of many studies. In commercial aviation, it is essential to address the aircraft stability, robustness, and precise tracking performance for ensuring passengers safety and comfort during the entire flight, especially during the cruise phase and in different flight environments. While conventional controllers revealed accurate performance, integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based methodologies can offer new features and capabilities to shape the next generation of flight control systems. These controllers can be developed without explicit knowledge of the aircraft model, effectively handle uncertainties, and control the aircraft with a fixed parameter configuration for all flight conditions with enhanced adaptive characteristics. The first article discusses a control methodology constructed by a Type One Adaptive Fuzzy Logic System (T1AFLS) and a Sliding Mode Control system (SMC), to control the aircraft pitch rate and True AirSpeed (TAS) during cruise. The T1FLS approximates the unknown dynamics, which are updated using adaptation laws designed by the Lyapunov theorem. Subsequently, the approximated functions are integrated into the SMC system to guarantee the aircraft tracking performance and ensure its stability and robustness. In the second article, the T1FLS was converted to an enhanced Type Two FLS using a new Type Reduction algorithm. This two-dimensional approximator can handle a larger number of uncertainties. The simulation results for this combination of the T2FLS, Adaptive Control, and SMC systems were compared with those of the T1AFSMC system. The comparison revealed that the T2AFSMC performed slightly better than the T1AFSMC. Both T2AFSMC systems, employed for both pitch rate and TAS control systems, could meet the requirements of aircraft stability, robustness, and tracking performance during the cruise. The third study focused on developing a control system for the aircraft lateral motion. The T2AFLS was employed to approximate the unknown aircraft dynamics during flight. This approximator was employed within a super-twisting sliding mode control system, enhanced with adaptation laws, and with the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm to find parameter values of the sliding mode controller. To address the coupled roll and yaw dynamics modes, an Integral controller acting on the aircraft sideslip angle, was used to stabilize the yaw rate indirectly. These methodologies were evaluated to ensure the aircraft appropriate performance, and the Adaptive super-twisting sliding mode performed better than the PSO-based sliding mode control. In the fourth paper, an autopilot control system was developed using a combination of Fuzzy Recurrent Neural Network (FRNN) and SMC systems. In this autopilot system, two separate FRNNs were developed for both Vertical Speed and Altitude Hold modes, which dynamically approximate the aircraft dynamics. Moreover, two sliding mode controllers were applied to allow the aircraft to track the reference signals in each mode. This autopilot system employed a new fuzzy transition algorithm to switch between these modes. The proposed methodologies were validated by a nonlinear simulation platform, developed using flight data from a Level D research aircraft flight simulator for the Cessna Citation X aircraft at the LARCASE in different flight conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».