MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7165229376

Utility of advanced training skills among GPs: a systematic review

2025· article· W7165229376 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hannah Mason, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Francis A. Albert, Emma Anderson, Faith O. Alele, Lawrie McArthur, Aaron Hollins, Paula Heggarty, Tarun Sen Gupta, Richard Hays, Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) · 2025
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAustralian College of Rural and Remote Medicine
Mots-clésCompetence (human resources)IndigenousSystematic reviewMEDLINEWork (physics)Needs assessmentProgram evaluationQuality (philosophy)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Advanced Skills Training (AST) is designed toprovide GPs with an opportunity to enhance their clinical practicein a narrower speciality. This is valuable particularly for rural andremote communities that cannot justify narrower specialist servicesin the local community. ASTs require additional focused training,usually for 12 months, in a selected procedural or non-proceduralskill such as anaesthetics, obstetrics, surgery, emergency medicine, paediatrics, adult internal medicine, mental health, Indigenous health or palliative care. Ideally, several practitioners with complementary AST experiences work together to provide a widerrange of extended scope practice according to community need. However, experience so far suggests that this goal is notnecessarily achieved. Thus, this systematic review aimed to assessthe value and fitness for purpose of AST and ensure that it ismeeting the growing demand for coordinated care in rural communities. This review addressed three questions: What is theeffectiveness of AST programs in improving GPs’ knowledge,attitudes and competence regarding rural clinical practice? How do stakeholders – including trainees, patients, management and the community – perceive the impact (value and fitness for purpose) ofthe AST program in rural clinical practice? To what extent are advanced skills training programs aligned with the needs of the community served? Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was implemented across six electronic databases (Medline Ovid, CINAHL, Emcare, Scopus, Web of Science and Informit) in December 2024. The quality of the studies was appraised using the Quality Assessment for Diverse Studies tool. Across all there viewed articles, data on the effectiveness of AST, stakeholder perceptions of its value and extent of alignment of AST with community needs in rural clinical practice were extracted and synthesised using a data extraction template. Results: Sixteen peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 employed qualitative study designs (n = 11, 68.8%) and five were quantitative (n=5, 31.3%). The majority were conducted in Canada (n=5, 31.3%) and Australia (n=5, 31.3%), followed by the US (n=4, 25.0%) and England (n=2, 12.5%). The findings revealed that the definition and scope of AST varied across the literature. Some defined it as advanced training that involves 12 months full-time equivalent in an accredited training post while others definedit as ‘tracks’, certificates, extended fellowships, residency programs or placements. Across the literature, participants note dimprovements in their knowledge, attitudes and competence regarding their clinical practice. The value and fitness for purposeof the AST program was demonstrated by registrars’ continued useof skills after AST training, soft skills development and community engagement opportunities, and rural workforce retention. The challenges reported for those undertaking AST programs were barriers to inclusion on remote visits (eg transportation space, training space), time efficiency and management, work loadfluctuation, gaps between training and use of skills, peerac knowledgement, and differences between the hospital settings in which training occurred and the rural contexts in which the skillswould be applied. Conclusion: Overall, this review provided evidence on the utility of AST for GPs. Despite the value of AST in GP clinical practice, some bottlenecks may be limiting its effectiveness. Current AST opportunities (both training and final practice location) and career pathways are not always aligned, potentially limiting the success ofthe AST strategy in bridging the gap between urban and rural health service status. Concerted efforts are required to improve alignment of career advice, community needs, training pathways, AST opportunities and final practice location in order to achieve the intended purpose. Further research is required on the impact of AST programs on community health outcomes.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,250
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,420
Écart entre enseignants0,365 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University)Même sujetGlobal Health Workforce IssuesTravaux en français237 207