Novice In-service Teacher Candidates in the case of Danish Upper Secondary Schools.:Excited, Exhausted, Self-efficient, and Compassion Fatigue.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The research questions pursued in this article are: What do novice teachers perceive as their main classroom challenges and how do these challenges correspond to the formation of self-efficacy and the risks of 'compassion fatigue'? In Denmark, to become an upper secondary school teacher, you are required to poses a university master’s degree in at best two relevant disciplines, supplemented by a Diploma in education. To obtain the diploma, the novice teacher candidates must complete a postgraduate teacher education program, where they alternate between everyday teaching practice and follow respectively general pedagogical as well as subject specific pedagogical courses. Further, they are offered sparring, and guidance from a more experienced colleague including reciprocal teaching observation. It is not possible to start this the program, without a contract of employment as a permanent teacher tenure in an upper secondary school (Qvortrup and Rasmussen, 2022). Though novices often enter their first teacher position excited, enthusiastic and full of energy, being a novice teacher is recognized as a challenging affair (Farrell, 2016). Novice teachers’ struggle, and it is far from everyone who makes it from novice to experienced teacher. Teacher retention is recognized as a challenge and many new teachers are considering whether to stay in the profession or give up. In previous studies, the challenges are linked to the fact that novice teachers often from day one, and unlike in many other professions, face the same responsibilities as more experienced colleagues. For many novice teachers, the initial infatuation is replaced with exhaustion, sense of powerlessness and frustration. For some, this induces somewhat of a ‘shock’ (Corcoran, 1981) or results in attrition or even retention from the teacher profession (Amitai and Van Houtte, 2022). Farrell (2016) even suggests that only the most determined can survive their first years. A recent survey-study found teachers perceived self-efficacy in relation to their pedagogical practice to only correlate significantly to one factor: teaching experience (Cirocki, Ito, Soden and Noret, 2024). Besides the lack of teaching experience, another explanation for novices whose experiences of mastering teaching are absent or delayed and with no professional role models to lean in to, is to develop a lack of self-efficacy. But self-efficacy, does not indicate, which aspects novice teachers lack mastering experiences in relation to. Is it a question of pedagogical content knowledge, subject specific content knowledge, knowledge on students' learning processes, didactic methods, hybrids thereof or something completely different? Further several research on teacher candidates indicate, that novice teacher pay great attention to their students as individual persons (Rasmussen, Agergaard and Hansen, 2024) and empirical data in the current study indicates that it is relevant to introduce the concept ‘Compassion fatigue’, when it comes to describing the novice teachers’ emotional challenges when it comes to supporting students “who experience traumatic stress and suffering” (Asquith, 2022) or are in difficult life situations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».