MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7165482018 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20785046

Mitigating Heat Leakage and Thermal Stress in Cryogenic Storage Systems for Deep Space Missions

2023· article· en· W7165482018 sur OpenAlexaff
H N Paramesha

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Établissements canadiensImpact
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPropellantThermal energy storageThermalNASA Deep Space NetworkSpacecraftSpace explorationThermal radiationSpace Shuttle thermal protection system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

high-reliability systems capable of surviving harsh radiative environments while maintaining the thermal stability required to preserve propellant integrity, a fundamental prerequisite for any permanent lunar or Martian base. In these environments, the storage tank is not merely a container; it is the mission’s lifeline, and its ability to maintain cryogenic conditions under years of solar exposure defines the boundary of what is logistically possible in interplanetary logistics. To achieve this, the industry is increasingly moving toward "Zero Boil-Off" (ZBO) targets, which necessitate a holistic redesign of the spacecraft’s thermal architecture, moving away from simple passive shielding towards integrated active thermal management systems that can adapt to changing mission phases. 2. Thermal Management Challenges The storage of cryogens in microgravity and deep space environments involves complex fluid-thermal coupling. In static conditions, continuous heat ingress into the tank leads to partial vaporization of the cryogenic fluid, which necessitates venting to manage internal pressure. This management process itself consumes mission resources and risks the loss of valuable propellant mass, an outcome that is catastrophic for long-range missions where every kilogram of fuel represents critical mission capability. 2.1 Thermal Stratification A significant issue in long-term storage is thermal stratification, where temperature gradients form within the propellant bulk. In the absence of gravity-driven convection, heat ingress creates distinct layers of varying density and temperature. This leads to localized heating and uneven pressure distribution. When a storage tank is exposed to unidirectional heating, such as solar radiation on one side of the spacecraft, the liquid-vapor interface may experience localized nucleate boiling, which further accelerates pressure rise. If left unchecked, this stratification can trigger localized tank wall hot spots, leading to accelerated evaporation and potential pressure vessel failure when venting cycles fail to compensate for the rapid state change at the interface. Furthermore, the lack of buoyancy-driven mixing means that once stratification begins, it can persist for the duration of the cruise phase, making the management of the fluid-vapor interface one of the most unpredictable variables in space propellant logistics. To combat this, future designs may incorporate internal electromagnetic mixers or acoustic stirrers to encourage bulk mixing without relying on gravity, thereby ensuring a uniform temperature distribution that simplifies pressure prediction and vent control. By maintaining this uniform state, engineers can prevent the formation of high-pressure vapor pockets, which are often the primary cause of tank structural degradation and excessive venting requirements in current long-duration storage architectures. This homogeneity also enhances the accuracy of fuel mass sensors, which currently struggle to account for non-uniform densities within the bulk fluid during critical maneuver phases. 2.2 Thermal Stress and Structural Integrity Materials used in tank construction, such as stainless steel, aluminum alloys, or carbon-fiber reinforced polymers, must withstand extreme cryogenic temperatures without becoming brittle. The differential thermal contraction between insulation materials and the tank wall, coupled with external environmental loading, generates significant thermal stresses. These stresses are amplified during high-acceleration launch phases followed by long-duration cold soaking in space. Repeated thermal cycling during the transition from Earth departure to deep space cruise introduces cyclic loading that can cause micro-fractures in tank seals and structural joints. Ensuring the structural reliability of these systems requires meticulous attention to the coefficient of thermal expansion mismatches between the primary tank structure and the secondary insulation layers or mounting brackets. Moreover, the integration of health monitoring sensors is increasingly necessary to detect the earliest stages of fatigue, as even minor structural compromise under extreme cryogenic conditions can propagate rapidly into catastrophic failure. Innovative solutions such as functionally graded materials that transition gradually between the metal tank and the external mounting structures offer a promising pathway to mitigate these stress concentrations at structural interfaces. Furthermore, the application of thin-film piezoelectric sensors directly onto the tank walls provides real-time, high-fidelity data on vibrational modes and acoustic emission events, allowing ground control to intervene or adjust mission parameters before microscopic damage compromises the vessel's pressure containment capability. Beyond individual components, this necessitates a move toward "digital twin" architectures, where the tank's operational history—including every thermal cycle and mechanical shock—is modeled to predict the remaining useful life of the system with unprecedented precision. 3. Passive Thermal Control Technologies Passive systems are the first line of defense against heat leakage, functioning without external power input. These systems are inherently reliable because they have no moving parts and do not consume precious electrical power generated by solar arrays or nuclear sources, making them ideal for long-term cruise phases where power budgets are tightly constrained and redundancy is a non-negotiable mission requirement. 3.1 Multilayer Insulation Multilayer insulation remains the state-of-the-art insulation for space applications. It consists of multiple layers of reflective material, typically aluminized polymer films, separated by low-conductivity spacer materials. By creating a vacuum-like barrier between the tank surface and the external environment, these layers reflect infrared radiation and suppress conduction. While highly effective in a high-vacuum environment, this insulation is fragile and can degrade under launch-induced loads, which may compress the spacer materials and bridge the thermal gaps. Advanced variants now incorporate vapor-deposited metal coatings with specific emissivity properties to maximize thermal resistance, effectively minimizing the effective emissivity of the entire insulation blanket to near-zero levels. Future iterations are exploring the use of aerogel-infused spacers to provide even lower thermal conductivity while maintaining the necessary structural distance between the highly reflective film layers. Moreover, researchers are investigating the use of "smart" blankets capable of active tensioning to prevent the settling of material over time, ensuring that the thermal performance of the insulation remains consistent throughout a mission's decade-long life cycle. This technological evolution allows the insulation system to adapt to physical settling or vibrations, essentially creating a self-correcting thermal barrier that maintains optimal performance regardless of the mechanical stresses encountered during launch or docking maneuvers. Beyond the insulation itself, vacuum-jacketed structural supports serve as a critical secondary passive strategy, utilizing high-aspect-ratio carbon fiber links to break conductive thermal pathways while retaining high load-bearing capacity. 3.2 Cryogenic Selective Surfaces Recent developments include the use of selective surface coatings designed to reflect solar radiation while maintaining high infrared emissivity to shed heat to the surrounding cold space environment. These coatings are applied to tank exteriors and support struts to passively lower the equilibrium temperature of the storage system. By tailoring the optical properties of the outer layer, designers can ensure that the tank stays cool even when directly illuminated by the Sun. This strategy essentially uses space as a heat sink, allowing the tank to radiate excess absorbed solar energy away into the deep vacuum, maintaining a stable, low-temperature equilibrium that drastically reduces the burden on secondary insulation. Ongoing research is focused on developing coatings that are not only optically selective but also resilient to the harsh atomic oxygen and high-energy particle radiation found in deeper space environments, which can degrade surface performance over time. By incorporating nanostructured materials that demonstrate self-healing properties when bombarded by high-energy solar particles, the longevity of these selective surfaces can be significantly extended, allowing for reliable thermal protection across years of deep space travel. This advance in surface engineering represents a paradigm shift, moving from static, prone-to-degradation protective layers to active, resilient material interfaces that actively manage the radiative heat exchange between the propellant system and the external space environment. By tuning the absorption and emission spectra of the coating with molecular-level precision, we can ensure that tanks stay within their operational temperature window regardless of their orientation relative to the Sun, thus enabling highly flexible orbital flight paths without requiring constant spacecraft maneuvering. 4. Active Thermal Control Technologies For missions requiring zero-boil-off or long-duration storage, passive systems alone are often insufficient to combat the persistent heat soak from onboard equipment or prolonged exposure to high-heat sources like the Sun or planetary atmospheres. 4.1 Thermodynamic Venting Systems Thermodynamic venting systems technology is considered an effective solution for managing tank pressure in microgravity. By integrating a heat exchanger, often featuring a spray-bar array that introduces subcooled liquid into the vapor space, these systems can actively transfer heat leakage from the bulk liquid into a vented portion of the fluid, thereby reducing strati

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,556
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,549

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesTravaux en français237 207