Indigenous Peoples, Globalization, and Education: Making Connections
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This article emphasizes the importance of including Indigenous people in discussions of globalization and education.It features two narratives based on ethnographic research that I, an Indigenous person from the first world-a Cree/Metis from Saskatchewan, conducted among an Indigenous people in the third world, the Ju/'hoansi 1 from the village of /Kae/kae in the Kalahari Desert of Botswana, Africa.I build on the concept of globalization from below to comment on these two narratives.Globalization from below can be said to consist of "an array of transnational social forces animated by environmental concerns, human rights, hostility to patriarchy, and a vision of human community based on the unity of diverse cultures seeking an end to poverty, oppression, humiliation, and collective violence" (Brecher & Costello, 1994, p. 80).Globalization from below provides a framework for the inclusion of voices such as those of Indigenous peoples, presently marginalized in the debate on globalization.It is in this larger context of globalization that Indigenous voices must be heard and addressed, especially as these peoples presently occupy land and are in possession of both knowledge and resources that are in high demand by transnational corporations (Shiva, 1991a(Shiva, , 1991b)).This article explores a different aspect of marginalized voices than that discussed in the large body of postcolonial literature that theorizes the effects of Diaspora on various colonized people (Bhabha, 1994; Said, 1978; Spivak, 1988).Whereas these writers explore the movement of colonial subjects into the West, in this article I support the need for Indigenous people both to join this general discussion and to speak with one another across national boundaries.The need for developing connections between Indigenous peoples in the context of globalization is reflected in my work with the Ju/'hoansi and highlights coalition-building as an important aspect of globalization from below.As Brecher and Costello (1994) suggest, resistance to globalization by the "formation of extraordinary coalitions" is occurring, but at this time those efforts of resistance are "still highly fragmented" (p.83).They suggest that if the various forms of resistance occurring around the world are not directed and developed under both local and international coalitions, the resulting effect is fragmentation that "is easily exploited by those who would make workforces, peoples, and communities compete with each other in the 'race to the bottom'" (Brecher & Costello, 1994, p. 84).If efforts to make stronger connections between the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».