Re-experiencing Military Trauma in Groups: A Veteran's Case Study Revivre les traumatismes militaires en groupe : Étude de cas d'un ancien combattant
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Although different theoretical orientations for trauma-focused psychotherapy exist, foundational to all of them is re-experiencing the trauma to explore trauma-related thoughts and emotions (Foa, Huppert, & Cahill, 2006; Paivio & Pascual-Leo ne, 2010). The underlying assumption across these orientations is that avoidance of the trauma-related thoughts and emotions leads to psychological distress. Further, by re-experiencing the trauma, new and more adaptive information is integrated into clients' emotional and belief structures.Various theoretical orientations use different interventions to facilitate reexperiencing trauma. For example, prolonged exposure-a cognitive-behavioural orientation-utilizes imaginai exposure (Foa, Hembree, & Rothbaum, 2007). During imaginai exposure, clients recount the trauma in the present tense, recalling as many specifics as possible, and the therapist facilitates specificity by asking the client to recall omitted details. This narrative is repeated until the client experiences reduced distress due to habituation to the memory. In cognitive processing therapy-another cognitive-behavioural approach-clients write their trauma narrative and, with the therapist, utilize the written account to identify and alter maladaptive beliefs related to the event (Resick, Monson, & Chard, 2007).In psychodynamic orientations, therapists often use the therapeutic relationship to explore the experience and meaning of traumatic events (Kudler, Krupnick, Blank, Herman, & Horowitz, 2009). For example, a psychodynamic psychotherapist may use transference to bring traumatic reactions into the present for interpretation, processing, or other purposes. In emotion-focused therapy, therapists use imaginai confrontation (IC)-the client speaks to the offender in the trauma as if the offender were sitting across from the client (Paivio & PascualLeone, 2010). IC facilitates eliciting the client's thoughts and emotions toward that person and the event to explore and resolve the negative emotions related to the self, offender, and trauma.The vividness of re-experiencing has been found to mediate psychotherapeutic outcome. Across therapeutic orientations, higher levels of feeling emotions in one's body during psychotherapy predict better outcomes (Bohart, 1993; Hendricks, 2002). In a related line of research, the degree to which therapists focus on hotspots-the most distressing moments of the trauma memory-predicts clients' posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom reduction (Nijdam, Baas, Olff, & Gersons, 2013). Taken together, this literature indicates the importance of creating and evaluating interventions for re-experiencing trauma memories.THERAPEUTIC ENACTMENT: A GROUP-BASED INTERVENTIONTherapeutic enactment (TE) is a group-based intervention used to vividly reexperience traumatic events (Westwood & Wilensky, 2005). Prior to the group, one or both group therapists meet with each group member to identify the most distressing trauma (i.e., the index trauma) and the surrounding events. Together, the client and therapists plan and construct the scenario to be enacted so the therapists are aware of what the enactment will be and thus able to actively direct the trauma scene. This further facilitates clients' vivid experiencing during the enactment; because the group therapists instruct, organize, and plan the sequencing of events throughout the TE, clients can focus on their present experiences. In the group session, six to eight group members take turns enacting their index traumas (we have conducted TEs in several-day-long retreat-style groups and in more traditional once-a-week group sessions over several weeks). While description and evaluation of programs that utilize TE as one of several interventions have been presented elsewhere (see Cox et al., 2014), the present article focuses solely on TE.With the assistance of the group members, therapists recreate the index traumatic event of one group member (hereafter referred to as the lead) at a time. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».