MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W746556899

Things That Matter: Three Decades of Passions, Pastimes and Politics

2014· article· en· W746556899 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dwight D. Murphey

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œJournal of social, political, and economic studies · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePoetry Analysis and Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPassionsPoliticsIdeologySociologyIndependence (probability theory)Style (visual arts)LawHistoryPsychoanalysisMedia studiesPolitical sciencePsychologyArtLiterature
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Things That Matter: Three Decades of Passions, Pastimes and Politics Charles Krauthammer Crown Forum, 2013.This Charles Krauthammer tells us, originally going to be collection of my writings about but politics. Things beautiful, mysterious, profound or just odd. There's much of that sort in book, but he discovered that was impossible to leave politics out of it, because he found that everything lives or dies by politics... Get your politics wrong, and stands to be swept away. The result is that Things That Matter, collection of his columns (and five somewhat longer essays) spanning more than three decades, gives readers fully representative window into his long intellectual journey.Krauthammer will hardly need an introduction to readers in United States, to whom his columns have been available in number of media for more than three decades. They will recognize his writing as combination of frequently sharp insight, Mark Twain- or Tom Wolfe-like facility for acute perception of his fellow man, independence of thinking, and refusal to bend to demands of ideological conformity (presently called correctness) - sprinkled with occasional lapses into tunnel vision and unquestioning conventionality. When his columns are put together in one place, as they are here, result is book with multiple rewards. The style often provokes chuckle, and substance is almost always provocative.Even for American readers, however, will be helpful to review Krauthammer's varied background. Born to Belgian mother and French father comprising Jewish-immigrant household, he spent much of his childhood in Montreal. He studied political philosophy at Oxford before going on to medical school, where he became psychiatrist who favored empirical rather than Freudian psychology. His penchant for writing led to articles in The New Republic, speechwriting for Vice President Walter Mondale, regular back- page essay for Time, and column in Washington Post since 1984. These associations illustrate Krauthammer's early social-democratic orientation and explain his life-long affiliation with Democratic Party, but any such categorizing is insufficient. His thinking, rather than remaining static, has evolved. He says he was always Cold War liberal, which was one given to assertion of American power in defense of non-Communist world, and that he gave up on on foreign policy issues when during Reagan administration they adopted foreign policy of retreat. Whereas Democrats left him, as he sees it, on those issues, was he who left them on domestic matters. Explaining that I'm open to empirical evidence, he says the results of Great Society experiments started coming in and began showing that, for its good intentions, War on Poverty was causing irreparable damage to very communities was designed to help. From that realization it was but short distance to philosophy of restrained, free-market governance... vision of limited government that, while providing for helpless, is committed above to guaranteeing individual liberty.The insightful perceptions and acute Mark Twain-like observations appear frequently in columns. Take, for example, passage in which he comments on how ridiculous is for genetic engineering to eliminate unique traits of dogs of various types, such as cocker spaniels, bulldogs and Boston Terriers, to mold them into better show dogs. We can almost hear voice of Samuel Clemens (i.e., Mark Twain) when Krauthammer says a society that grieves for accidental demise of snail darter... should not easily acquiesce to deliberate destruction of unique breed of animals. Pointing to high intelligence of border collies, he asks Must we ruin this too? Reduce to imbecility in name of prettiness? Another example is when he takes on platitude that all people are basically alike. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,070

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,020
Communication savante0,0170,011
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œJournal of social, political, and economic studiesMême sujetPoetry Analysis and CriticismTravaux en français237 207