MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W746595267

Macbeth, Julius Caesar, A Midsummer Night's Dream and Bartholomew Fair

2009· article· en· W746595267 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan Goossen

Notice bibliographique

RevueEarly modern literary studies · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDreamArtArt historyTicketHistoryPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Macbeth, Julius Caesar, A Midsummer Night's Dream and Bartholomew Fair, performed by the Stratford Shakespeare Festival, Stratford, Ontario, June-October 2009.Macbeth. Director: Des McAnuff. With Colm Feore (Macbeth), Yanna McIntosh (Lady Macbeth), and Timothy D. Stickney (Banquo).Julius Caesar. Director: James MacDonald. With Ben Carlson (Brutus), Tom Rooney (Cassius), Jonathan Goad (Mark Antony), and Geraint Wyn Davies (Julius Caesar).A Midsummer Night's Dream. Director: David Grindley. With Timothy D. Stickney (Theseus), Cara Ricketts (Hippolyta), Tom Rooney (Puck), and Geraint Wyn Davies (Bottom).Bartholomew Fair. Director: Antoni Cimolino. With Christopher Prentice (Winwife), Jonathan Goad (Quarlous), Trent Pardy (Bartholomew Cokes), Lucy Peacock (Ursla), and Tom McCamus (Justice Overdo).1. The lead-up to the Canadian Stratford Shakespeare Festival's 2009 season was fraught with the financial uncertainty of the times. In 2008, the Festival had run its first deficit in fifteen years, losing a whopping $2.6-million due partly to a drop in attendance. So when by April 2009 ticket sales were down again by nearly 15% over last spring, it began to brace itself, announcing that several of this year's planned performances were being put on hold (Stratford). But the surprise influx of $4.6-million from the federal and Ontario governments' economic stimulus packages soon brightened up the spring and encouraged management to put the full schedule back in place. Summer, however, was slow to appear: despite an initial bump in interest due to the increased advertising that the grants enabled, ticket sales at the end of June were as cool as the Ontario weather, causing the Festival to go cap-in-hand to its own board members and politely ask that they throw in some of their personal resources to help keep the Festival in the black (Posner).2. Moreover, and not unrelated to these budgetary vacillations, there were continuing rumours of strife between the board - conservative at the best of times, never mind these - and its flamboyant artistic director Des McAnuff. His vision for the Festival has resulted in restoring musicals to its marquee Festival Theatre (from which they had earlier been banished in the name of more traditional dramatic fare), and includes plans for a significant renovation of that venue's legendary stage, neither of which is thought to sit well with his superiors (Posner). McAnuff, in only his second year with the Festival, is a complete outsider to Stratford, unlike many of his predecessors. He has spent the last 20 years in both San Diego and New York, where his work has consisted largely of decidedly pop American musicals, not the classical fare on which Stratford has historically prided itself. was originally hired in 2007 to share the artistic directorship with Stratford veterans Marti Maraden and Dave Shipley, but his bent brought about this more classically-oriented pair's disgruntled resignation six weeks before the 2008 season opened. That subsequently remained in sole leadership of the Festival disappointed many critics who had hoped that Maraden and Shipley's influence might finally succeed in pushing it out of what they frequently lamented as the populist rut it had fallen into under former artistic director Richard Monette (Parolin 198-200).3. The most tangible indicator of McAnuff's direction was to be found in his 2008 production of Romeo and Juliet. His design effectively overwrote key aspects of the Festival Theatre's stage, while the production opened with loud gunfire, ranged in time from the twentieth century to the seventeenth and back again, and cast McAnuff's young Broadway protege Nikki M. James as Juliet alongside Gareth Potter's Romeo. Critics were lukewarm toward the production: McAnuff delivers an exciting piece of theatre. But when it's time to zero in on the two young lovers, there's [sic] no bells and whistles left (Ouzounian, Foiled); Potter and James have little chemistry (Nestruck) and just can't carry the text (Ouzounian). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,829
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEarly modern literary studiesMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207