MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W75007436

Collagenous sprue: a distinctive and heterogeneous clinicopathologic disorder.

2009· article· en· W75007436 sur OpenAlexaff
Hugh James Freeman

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMicroscopic Colitis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpruePathologyMedicineBiologyGenetics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1970, Weinstein and associates1 described a distinctive abnormality in small bowel biopsies from a 51-year-old woman initially thought to have celiac disease. The changes in the present case report by Xiao and colleagues2 are similar to this original case study. In the original report, biopsies stained with hematoxylin and eosin showed a prominent band of subepithelial eosinophilic hyaline material in the lamina propria. The deposits were notable due to their histochemical features of collagen, and ultrastructural evaluation confirmed the presence of an electron-dense material with the typical 640 A axial periodicity of collagen fibers. Prior biopsies showed changes of untreated celiac disease with flattened villi, but response to a gluten-free diet failed to occur. Later, her clinical course worsened with severe diarrhea, malabsorption, and weight loss. Symptoms transiently improved with corticosteroids. She died approximately 4 years later, and a postmortem examination showed abnormal and very extensive pathologic changes in the proximal small intestine with subepithelial eosinophilic hyaline of varying degrees of thickness. In addition, short segments of normal intestine were present in the distal small intestine. The investigators noted two earlier reports by Schein3 in 1947 and Hourihane4 in 1963 possibly representing the identical biopsy lesion (though in the latter, ileal involvement was evident). Thus, this distinctive and intriguing disorder was initially shown to have the following features: persistent diarrhea with pan-malabsorption causing nutrient deficiency and weight loss; distinctive histopathologic changes that include a unique morphologic marker, a subepithelial band with the histochemical (and ultrastructural) features of collagen; other histopathologic changes similar to untreated celiac disease but not responsive to a gluten-free diet; and diffuse and patchy mucosal changes of variable severity, localized mainly in the proximal small intestine. In the case presented by Xiao and coworkers, the diagnosis of collagenous sprue was supported by at least the first two features (though ultrastructural studies were not performed). However, a gluten-free diet provided for only 2 weeks would not be adequate to exclude concomitant celiac disease, as duodenal biopsy improvement may require months or even years, particularly in older adults.5 Finally, overall severity and extent of the changes along the length of the small intestine could not be fully detailed. This case emphasizes a very important clinical issue. The diagnosis of celiac disease (or gluten sensitive enteropathy) is pathologically-based and has traditionally depended upon two sequential criteria: documentation of the typical histopathologic features of untreated disease in small bowel mucosal biopsies; and response to a gluten-free diet. Otherwise, celiac disease, even if present, cannot be defined. In some cases, a “flattened” biopsy appearance may be present, but a gluten-free diet response has not been documented. Some of these cases have been loosely labeled as refractory celiac disease, but this label should be reserved for those that show an initial response to a glu-ten-free diet followed by later development of recurrent symptoms and biopsy changes. The most common causes for this scenario in celiac disease include poor dietary compliance or inadvertent ingestion of a ubiquitous gluten-containing food source (eg, pill capsules, communion wafers). A second cause or a superimposed cause (eg, infection, folate or zinc deficiency) for recurrence could also occur. Moreover, a different cause for a “flattened” biopsy appearance may be responsible,6 the initial correct diagnosis (eg, Crohn’s disease in the duodenum without mucosal granulomas) may have been missed,7 or an associated or complicating disease (eg, collagenous colitis, lymphoma) may have developed. Finally, a miscellaneous or “wastebasket” group with a “flat” biopsy appearance may be present with no evidence that a gluten-free diet response had ever occurred. This group does not meet the two traditional criteria for celiac disease (or even refractory celiac disease). More precise terms are sprue-like intestinal disease or unclassified sprue.8 In the present case, a specific cause for clinical and pathologic changes could be defined because of the unique pathologic features found in collagenous sprue. The possible relationship to celiac disease was also raised here. Some physicians originally believed that increased subepithelial collagen may simply represent only a prognostic pathologic marker for a poor outcome in celiac disease.9 Others, however, viewed collagenous sprue as an entirely new, previously unrecognized small bowel disorder that is poorly responsive to a gluten-free diet.10 More recent studies have also noted some other shared elements between celiac disease and collagenous sprue. For example, common clinical features have been documented (eg, hyposplenism, positive endomysial anti-bodies)11 as well as complications, including both T-cell and B-cell lymphoma in both entities.12,13 The present case also illustrates another intriguing aspect of collagenous sprue that continues to be explored. Collagen deposition was also present in the colon as in earlier reports demonstrating collagen deposits in the colon (ie, collagenous colitis) or even the stomach (ie, collagenous gastritis).14 An associated inflammatory process in either colonic or gastric mucosa, or both, is usually present, often including epithelial lymphocytosis. Interestingly, collagenous or lymphocytic colitis or gastritis have all been associated with biopsy-defined celiac disease.14-16 Together, these findings suggest a far more extensive pathologic process and may also represent an important clue to a far more heterogeneous process than has been previously appreciated. Historically, published reports have suggested that the natural history of collagenous sprue is characterized by worsening malabsorption, usually of multiple nutrients, with an inevitably fatal outcome. In most cases, diarrhea and progressive weight loss were documented, and on rare occasions, abdominal pain, sometimes severe, was present, often with vasculitis.17 However, independent reports with extensive biopsy studies have also demonstrated complete histologic resolution of the lesion and disappearance of the abnormal collagen deposits after steroid therapy for prolonged periods of time.18,19 This suggests that the lesion may occasionally be reversible, in some patients, at least temporarily for extended periods of years. In the present report, steroids were also used and a response was noted in the colon, but not in the small bowel. This differential treatment response suggests that these collagen deposits and their accompanying inflammatory processes could be quite heterogeneous along the length of the gastrointestinal tract. The cause of these collagenous deposits may also be quite different from case to case. In addition to celiac disease, collagenous sprue has not only been complicated by T-cell lymphoma, but has been associated with its occur-rence.13 Finally, collagen deposits in both the small and large intestines were detected with an apparently coincidental, but localized, colorectal cancer.20 Later, clinical and histopathologic changes resolved after the cancer was resected, suggesting that these collagen deposits could represent an important paraneoplastic morphologic marker of occult malignant disease.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetMicroscopic ColitisTravaux en français237 207