MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W750845053

Global Competition for Brains and Talent

2015· article· en· W750845053 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of international affairs · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational Leadership and Innovation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPaceCompetition (biology)Dominance (genetics)Higher educationPopulationImmigrationEconomic growthEconomicsPolitical scienceSociologyGeographyLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recent years have seen the emergence of an international market for higher education. It is likely that the number of international students worldwide may have reached 5.2 million in 2014, with these students responsible for expenditures for tuition, accommodation, and other living expenses of no less than $50 billion. Since 1970, the number of international students is estimated to have doubled every fifteen years, on average, and the pace may be accelerating because of the expanding pool of tertiary education graduates in emerging economies where more education suppliers are entering the market. (1) Experts predict that there will be at least 8 million international students by 2025, a larger group than the total population of Switzerland, Norway, or Ireland. (2) This article traces the growth of student migration to the Cold War period when it was driven largely by the competition between the Soviet bloc and the West for influence in the developing world, how it has since been transformed (and now is being driven mainly by competition for dominance in technological innovation and trade), and concludes with questions on what it means for the less-developed countries of origin. ********** A NEW WAVE IN INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION There is a consensus that bright, young foreigners seeking higher education should be welcomed. Almost every Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member state has adopted student-friendly immigration policies, from shortening the time it takes to process student visa applications to allowing longer employment after receiving degrees. (3) New countries are entering the education market, including Japan, China, Singapore, Malaysia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, and India. At the 169th Session of the Japanese Diet in 2008, then-prime minister Yasuo Fukuda announced a Plan for 300,000 Exchange Students, a program intended to make Japan more open to the world. (4) In the field of education, China is another major education supplier. According to scholar Ronald Skeldon, there were already 238,000 foreign students in China in 2009, more than the corresponding figures in Australia or Canada. (5) Europe attracts the highest number of foreign students, some 2.16 million in 2012, of which intra-European Union (EU) movements account for about 40 percent. (6) However, among individual countries, the United States is the largest destination, hosting some 819,000 international students in 2012. The other country in North America, Canada, hosts some 143,000 students. The Chinese are the biggest contingent of new students enrolling in foreign schools and universities, from nearby Japan to far off England. (7) Accounting for 19.8 percent of all international students worldwide, the Chinese comprise the largest group enrolling in American, British, Japanese, and Korean universities in recent years. In Germany, they account for a bigger proportion of students than any of Germany's neighbors, and were only slightly less in number than the Turks. Asian students accounted for almost half of all international students in the OECD countries, while European students accounted for another 28 percent. (8) The pool of potential international students has greatly expanded, thanks to the rising incomes and the growth of tertiary education systems in developing countries. In China, the central government adopted a Great Leap Forward policy in tertiary education in 1999; as a consequence, today no less than 33 million youth are enrolled in higher education institutions compared to a mere 7.4 million in 2000.9 In India, between 1990 and 2006, the number of institutions of higher learning tripled from 6,000 to 18,000, and enrollments more than doubled from 4.5 to 10.5 million. Indeed, between 1990 and 2006, the number of Indians who went abroad to study more than doubled. (10) Many who go abroad for study do so in pursuit of more advanced degrees after getting their first degrees at home. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,804
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,136

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,066
Tête enseignante GPT0,376
Écart entre enseignants0,309 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle