Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The notion that pregnancy is a time of uninterrupted joy, happiness, and contentment has been challenged by evidence-based research showing that, to the contrary, many women are distressed by depressive disorders in pregnancy. ' Only in the past 2 decades have psychiatrists started to acknowledge and understand the morbidity and mortality associated with psychiatric disorders in the antenatal period. Although postnatal depression has acquired celebrity status, antenatal depression will need a massive campaign of equal magnitude to bring it into the limelight. Because the signs of pregnancy closely overlap with symptoms of depression, diagnosis of antenatal depression is often difficult. Similarly, the overwhelming transition into motherhood, with its attendant anxiety, can often mask underlying pathological postpartum mental illness and delay help seeking.2 Accurate and timely identification of perinatal depression has significant implications, both for the mother and for the developing fetus or child. In March 2007, recognizing and responding to this need, British Columbia's Ministry of Health, in partnership with the Reproductive Mental Health (RMH) program, implemented a screening initiative using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.3 In keeping with best-practice guidelines, this screening, which will take place between 28 to 32 weeks of gestation and 6 to 8 weeks postpartum, will positively affect the lives of pregnant and postpartum women in British Columbia. Women are reluctant to accept any psychiatric diagnosis in pregnancy or postpartum, owing to the shock, fear, denial, and stigma that accompany mental illness. To help overcome this barrier, clinicians and women must share decision making, involve a significant other in the treatment plan, and deal with the woman's concerns compassionately. In the light of rapidly accumulating data on the adverse effects of persistent, relapsing mental illness on the mother and her child, maintaining emotional stability in the perinatal period is absolutely mandatory. The obvious concern that arises after a diagnosis is the availability of safe, effective, and affordable intervention for the suffering mother. The treatment issue has been in the forefront of treating physicians' minds, particularly in the last 2 years, as Federal Drug Administration warnings and Health Canada advisories have been appearing almost steadily. On the one hand, research demonstrates that discontinuing medication causes relapse in about 75% of women during pregnancy.4 On the other hand, reinstating psychotropic medications is fraught with trepidation and apprehension. Current research in relation to perinatal medication use is controversial, at best. The latest recommendation from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology clearly recognizes that the potential risk of continuing antidepressant use throughout pregnancy must be considered in the context of risk for relapse of depression if maintenance therapy is discontinued.5 Given the current unease regarding the safety of antidepresdant use, many clinicians and researchers are exploring other treatment modalities in this population. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is one such treatment that is attracting interest and consideration because of its effectiveness in the nonperinatal population.6 Obviously, its efficacy, sustainability, accessibility, and affordability in perinatal women requires further research. The RMH program, in conjunction with the Ministry of Health, is currently piloting a project to develop a framework for applying CBT in perinatal women with mood and anxiety disorders. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».