Notice bibliographique
Résumé
By James Gustave Speth and Peter M. Haas Washington, DC:Island Press, 2006. 179 pp. ISBN: 1-59726-081-9, $40 Global Environmental Governance provides a very eloquent and concise statement of the key international events and milestones, as well as the most relevant concepts and philosophies that have influenced the global environmental agenda over the past decades. James Gustave Speth and Peter M. Haas are two well-respected figures, widely recognized for their contributions to the debate of environmental issues. In this book, they suggest a series of innovative proposals on how to improve the world environmental governance to confront one of the most complex problems that humanity is facing. In the initial chapters, the authors discuss some of the main environmental challenges and their implications for human well-being as well as the associated driving forces involved in each of them. They analyze the overall demographic and political context that industrialized and developing countries are facing, and they put into perspective the potentials and limitations of technological solutions to current and emerging environmental problems. They also address some of the difficult dilemmas directly involved with the enhancement of effective global governance, particularly how the current principles, concepts, and practices of sovereign nations are linked and interrelated with environmental issues in an increasingly interdependent and globalized world. Within this context, they provide a quick overview of the structural complexity of United Nations system and its specialized agencies, and they argue in favor of expanding the competencies of the United Nations Environment Program. Speth and Haas present very directly some of the inconsistencies and gaps between the proposals emerging from the most relevant environmental international conferences and their practical outcomes, starting with 1972 Stockholm Conference on Human Environment. They share some of the enthusiasm and optimism that characterized the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio de Janeiro, and the disappointment of the lead-up to the World Summit for Sustainable Development held in Johannesburg in 2002. The authors provide a systematic rather than a reductionist analysis of what has worked and how scientific knowledge has provided the substance for consensus building among nations. This has produced some environmental improvements, such as the reduction and control of chlorofluorocarbons and other chemicals that deplete the ozone layer, through the Montreal Protocol. The authors also present well-structured arguments of other international initiatives and negotiations that have not been as successful, and, as a result, many environmental problems continue to worsen, almost always as a consequence of economic and political interests promoted by special interest groups. The authors, like many others, recognize the importance of unresolved social problems that have translated into unacceptable inequities. These include realities such as the increasing concentration of wealth, the lack of justice and ethics that afflict many sectors of society, and the slow and limited progress toward participatory democracy in several nations. Greed on one hand and poverty and ignorance on the other are truly the perverse driving forces that hold the future of our civilization in the balance. Despite all the obstacles and setbacks, the authors are optimistic and give us hope. They suggest that thorny issues such as the conflicting views among some countries on how to reach consensus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions will be bridged, and that new perceptions of the severity and urgency of global environmental change, particularly in the United States and other countries, will cause leaders to adopt positions more in keeping with the growing body of scientific evidence, thereby incorporating major corporations as proactive and socially responsible partners. These new scenarios, among other strategic issues, are essential in the analysis of the possible environmental, political, economic, and social implications associated with the production of so-called biofuels and not only with the reduction of dependency on the importation of oil to industrialized countries. This book will be a valuable reference for both public policy makers and decision makers, as well as for scholars and academics interested in the environment, sustainability, and the future of humankind. It is without a doubt one of the best books I have read on global environmental governance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».