Role of Pitch Memory in Pitch Matching and Pitch Discrimination
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessThe ASHA LeaderFeature1 Aug 2005Role of Pitch Memory in Pitch Matching and Pitch Discrimination Robert E. Moore, Casie Keaton and Christopher Watts Robert E. Moore Google Scholar More articles by this author , Casie Keaton Google Scholar More articles by this author and Christopher Watts Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR1.10102005.4 SectionsAbout ToolsAdd to favorites ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In This study investigated the role of memory for pitch in pitch-matching ability and pitch-discrimination ability. Deutsch (1975) has proposed that pitch memory is a function of a specialized memory system. Participants performed three experimental tasks: pitch matching, pitch discrimination, and pitch discrimination with memory interference. In the pitch-matching task the participant heard a target tone (piano note) and attempted to vocally match the pitch of the target tone by producing “ah” for eight seconds. For the pitch-discrimination task, participants heard one of five reference tones that were followed by a target tone with a short silent period between the two tones. The frequencies of the reference tones ranged from 110 Hz to 220 Hz. For each reference tone, the target tone was either equal in frequency or differed from the target by +/- 75 cents. For each presentation, the participant indicated whether the reference tone was the same or different in pitch with respect to the target tone. The stimuli for the pitch discrimination with memory interference task were the same as for the pitch discrimination task except that four brief interference tones were placed in the silent period between the reference and target tones. The task for the participants in the pitch discrimination with memory interference task was to indicate if the pitch of the first tone and last tone was the same or different. There was a significant difference between pitch-discrimination ability with and without memory interference. This provides evidence that degrading pitch memory by interference has a significant effect on pitch-discrimination ability. Further, there was a significant correlation between pitch-matching ability and pitch-discrimination ability. Individuals who were good pitch discriminators tended to be good pitch matchers (and vice versa). This was in agreement with Watts et al. (2005). The correlation between the pitch matching and pitch discrimination with memory interference was not significant. When there was interference with memory, pitch discrimination ability declined, and there was no longer a significant relationship between pitch discrimination and pitch matching. It appears that one factor in one’s ability to discriminate (and therefore match) pitch is pitch memory. Previous research has indicated that individuals judged to have good singing voices are also good pitch matchers and pitch discriminators (Watts et al., 2005). Pitch memory may also be an important aspect of natural vocal talent. References Deutsch D. (1975). Auditory memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 87–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Watts C., Moore R., McCaughren K., & Carr M. (2005, in press). The relationship between vocal pitch matching skills and pitch discrimination skills in untrained accurate and inaccurate singers.Journal of Voice. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Author Notes Robert E. Moore, is assistant professor in the Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology at the University of South Alabama in Mobile. Contact him at [email protected]. Casie Keaton, is an audiologist in Savannah, GA. She received her master’s degree from the University of South Alabama in 2004. Contact her at [email protected]. Christopher Watts, is associate professor in the Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders at James Madison University in Harrisonburg, VA. Contact him at [email protected]. Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Additional Resources FiguresSourcesRelatedDetails Volume 10Issue 10August 2005 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in print: Aug 1, 2005 Metrics Downloaded 222 times Topicsasha-topicsleader_do_tagleader-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle