MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W76513265

Writing in Pictures: screenwriting Made (mostly) Painless by Joseph McBride (review)

2013· article· en· W76513265 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shahin Izadi

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Film and Video · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScreenwritingCraftStorytellingArtVisual artsPeck (Imperial)LiteratureAestheticsNarrative
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

WRITING IN PICTURES: SCREENWRITING MADE (MOSTLY) PAINLESS Joseph McBride. New York: Vintage, 2012, 365 pp.Joseph McBride has produced a novel, well- written, and entertaining guide to screenwrit- ing for fiction film. Perhaps best known as an accomplished film historian, McBride also has professional screenwriting experience, including cowriting Rock 'n' Roll High School and working with Orson Welles on dialogue for a character he played in Welles's unfinished film The Other Side of Wind. McBride also teaches screenwriting at San Francisco State University and states that this book arose out of his frustration with field of screenwriting guides: I couldn't find a book that actually gets into nitty-gritty of what's required to learn screenwriting craft in a systematic way and that does so concisely and without telling you how to write formulaic screenplays (4). Al- though one might dispute claim that there are no such books, McBride's guide should be counted a success by his own criteria.The book is divided into three parts. The first part deals with a number of preliminary top- ics, including a refreshingly upfront admission about how unwise it is to pursue screenwriting as means to money or fame. Parts 2 and 3 are where this book really distinguishes itself from other screenwriting guides. McBride believes that beginners should learn screenwriting by adapting a short story. He reasons that freeing students from burden of coming up with an original, workable idea allows them to focus on craft of storytelling for screen. This approach does not preclude creativity because of distinctive requirements of cin- ematic storytelling and because adaptations can be more or less faithful to their original sources.McBride breaks down process of writing an adapted half-hour screenplay into five steps. Steps 1 through 4 are presented in second part of book. The first step is to select a short and write a two-page prose sum- mary of it. This story is a condensed retelling of original literary work from begin- ning to end. A helpful feature of book is that McBride presents a completed example of each step after he describes its requirements; he then provides instructive critical analysis of his example as a setup for introducing next step. McBride chooses to adapt Jack London's To Build a Fire, of a brazen young man whose arrogance to trek without human company during a harsh Yukon winter in early 1900s leads to his death (the is in- cluded in one of book's appendices).The second step is the adaptation outline, which is similar to outline except that it presents as it will be adapted for screen. Here one has freedom to alter setting, time period, and characters as long as deviation is not so radical that becomes unrecognizable as an adaptation. The third step is to produce a character biography. Doing so paves way for fourth step of fleshing out adaptation outline into treatment, a detailed recounting of adapted that gives a clear sense of scene-by- scene structure of film. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,283
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Film and VideoMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207