MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W767174151 · doi:10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.4.4.0540

Speech upon Receiving the World Marxian Economics Award (II)

2013· article· en· W767174151 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Theotônio Dos Santos

Notice bibliographique

RevueWorld Review of Political Economy · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueEconomic Theory and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsIdeologyCapitalismSociologyWorld economyPraisePolitical economyNeoclassical economicsPolitical scienceEconomicsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I am very honored to receive World Marxian Economics Award 2013 from World Association for Political Economy (WAPE). I would like to praise efforts of large group of political economists in world who are in vanguard of fight against dominance of decadent thought (neoliberal) that takes economic theory back to 18th century, when European bourgeoisie tried to prove possibility of building an economic system based in free market, considered an ideal instrument for conversion of rational economic behavior in principle of organization of modern society. According to them this society will be realization of essence of human nature in concrete world.It is very important to we Brazilians who created our Society of Political Economy (SEP) 13 years ago, to receive your 8th Congress and to establish strong cooperation with you. At same time we are very happy to collaborate also in creation of Latin American Society of Political Economy that will be part of this common adventure in field of economic thought. All this means that we are developing an offensive that can liberate us from absurd economic policies inspired in ideological principles presented as scientific truth.Latin American thought achieved great prestige during 1960s and 1970s, when theory of dependence represented the greatest challenge faced by official Eurocentric thought, as affirmed by Swedish political scientist Bjorn Hetne in his detailed study about this theory. There are many controversies about creation of this theory, but without question our contribution was fundamental. According to Canadian sociologist, Lawrence Aschules, Dos Santos been one of first to articulate theory of dependency. Others have followed him and theory expanded in such way that, despite of its youth, we can consider him grandfather of theory.Anyway, in these years, I became so strongly identified with Latin American social thought that Russian philosopher Chestopol wrote, Theotonio Dos Santos, Brazilian sociologist, is most eminent representative of Nueva Dependencia school (...). With time, works of Dos Santos became symbol of Latin American Social Science, not only for colleagues from continent, but also from other countries in world.Due to global reach of my work, I was considered by economics department web site of Universidad de Malaga to be one of 250 greatest economists in history of this science.My contribution to social literature of region has particular characteristic of having been written in two regional languages, Spanish and Portuguese, as result of my long years of exile in Chile and Mexico. For this reason I decided to combine several articles and papers in an organized collection of my works in English in book under title of Fundamental Works: World System, Imperialism and Dependence. I hope that will permit an overview of my work, which I expect to be contribution that has more important role than merely regional and can be summarized in three main points:1. My academic contribution is considered important for methodology of inter- and trans-disciplinary activities. Economists, sociologists, political scientists, historians, anthropologists and philosophers have taken it as having also influenced their own disciplines. It was also an important influence to Liberation Theology and Liberation Philosophy.I was also accepted as substantial contributor to advance of methodology because I have introduced use and methodological control of levels of abstraction as an essential element of dialectical inquiry. My article on concept of social class that develops this methodology was considered by U.S. Marxist journal Science and Society as a classic on subject. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,878
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWorld Review of Political EconomyMême sujetEconomic Theory and PolicyTravaux en français237 207