Survey Spotlights Need for Data and Security Strategies: Organizations Must Know Where Their Critical Information Is Stored, Moved, and Processed
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * Managing and retaining emerged as the top technology priority of the U.S. and Canadian accounting professionals polled in the 2013 North America Top Technology Initiatives survey. This marked the first year the AICPA and CPA Canada jointly conducted the survey. * Securing the IT slipped to No. 2 on the priority rankings, but security issues remain top of mind. Most of the accountants surveyed doubt the ability of their employers and clients to protect mobile devices and outside of network firewalls and to detect and respond to a cyberattack. * number and sophistication of cyberattacks are increasing as criminals target the rapidly increasing amount of accessible via the internet and mobile devices. Organizations should view as an asset and implement management practices. * Data mining offers great potential for organizations, but only if they have the proper processes and policies in place. * U.S. CPAs are less confident than they were last year in the ability of their organizations to meet all the goals in their 2013 technology initiatives ********** On the surface, the results of the 2013 North America Top Technology Initiatives survey show that and retaining data nudged past the IT environment to become the top technology priority cited by the nearly 2,000 accounting professionals polled. Dig a little deeper, and the evidence indicates that the emphasis on stems at least in part from concerns about the increased security risks caused by the proliferation of mobile devices and the mass movement of confidential information to the cloud. Add to those factors the explosive growth in the amount of worldwide and the rapid rise in the number and sophistication of cyberthreats to the security of that data, and the result is a situation ripe for security breaches. no wonder then that the survey found increased concern with the prevention and response to computer fraud and decreased confidence among CPAs in the ability of their organizations to achieve success with their top tech initiatives. The challenge is to identify where resides and moves during the cycle, said Steven J. Ursillo Jr., CPA/CITE CGMA, principal and director of technology and assurance services for Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, a Rhode Island-based accounting firm that also provides technology and security audits and consulting. It's very challenging to govern all of that. This article looks at the results of the 2013 North America TTI survey and the implications for public accounting firms, businesses, and other organizations. THE SURVEY: U.S. vs. CANADA 2013 North America TTI survey was a joint effort of the AICPA and the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada). In the United States, the AICPA surveyed nearly 1,700 of its members from Feb. 12 through March 6. In Canada, CPA Canada surveyed more than 200 of its members from Feb. 14 through March 5 (for more, see the sidebar Survey Demographics.) Asked to prioritize the importance of their employers' and clients' 2013 technology initiatives, the U.S. CPAs and their Canadian counterparts responded with the same top two answers: managing and retaining data; and securing the IT (see Exhibit 1). There were some notable differences between the U.S. and Canadian respondents. poll found that the Canadian chartered accountants placed more emphasis than U.S. CPAs on using technology to enable decision support and analytics and on managing their IT investments and spending. U.S. respondents gave greater weight to managing IT risks, ensuring privacy, and, most notably, preventing and responding to computer fraud. CPA CONFIDENCE SLIPS U.S. CPAs surveyed were less confident than their Canadian counterparts of the ability of their organizations to achieve their top technology initiatives this year (see Exhibit 2). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,036 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».