MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W767894948

Survey Spotlights Need for Data and Security Strategies: Organizations Must Know Where Their Critical Information Is Stored, Moved, and Processed

2013· article· en· W767894948 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeff Drew

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueInformation and Cyber Security
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBusinessAsset (computer security)SophisticationConfidentialityInformation technologyThe InternetPublic relationsPhoneInternet privacyComputer securityComputer sciencePolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * Managing and retaining emerged as the top technology priority of the U.S. and Canadian accounting professionals polled in the 2013 North America Top Technology Initiatives survey. This marked the first year the AICPA and CPA Canada jointly conducted the survey. * Securing the IT slipped to No. 2 on the priority rankings, but security issues remain top of mind. Most of the accountants surveyed doubt the ability of their employers and clients to protect mobile devices and outside of network firewalls and to detect and respond to a cyberattack. * number and sophistication of cyberattacks are increasing as criminals target the rapidly increasing amount of accessible via the internet and mobile devices. Organizations should view as an asset and implement management practices. * Data mining offers great potential for organizations, but only if they have the proper processes and policies in place. * U.S. CPAs are less confident than they were last year in the ability of their organizations to meet all the goals in their 2013 technology initiatives ********** On the surface, the results of the 2013 North America Top Technology Initiatives survey show that and retaining data nudged past the IT environment to become the top technology priority cited by the nearly 2,000 accounting professionals polled. Dig a little deeper, and the evidence indicates that the emphasis on stems at least in part from concerns about the increased security risks caused by the proliferation of mobile devices and the mass movement of confidential information to the cloud. Add to those factors the explosive growth in the amount of worldwide and the rapid rise in the number and sophistication of cyberthreats to the security of that data, and the result is a situation ripe for security breaches. no wonder then that the survey found increased concern with the prevention and response to computer fraud and decreased confidence among CPAs in the ability of their organizations to achieve success with their top tech initiatives. The challenge is to identify where resides and moves during the cycle, said Steven J. Ursillo Jr., CPA/CITE CGMA, principal and director of technology and assurance services for Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, a Rhode Island-based accounting firm that also provides technology and security audits and consulting. It's very challenging to govern all of that. This article looks at the results of the 2013 North America TTI survey and the implications for public accounting firms, businesses, and other organizations. THE SURVEY: U.S. vs. CANADA 2013 North America TTI survey was a joint effort of the AICPA and the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada). In the United States, the AICPA surveyed nearly 1,700 of its members from Feb. 12 through March 6. In Canada, CPA Canada surveyed more than 200 of its members from Feb. 14 through March 5 (for more, see the sidebar Survey Demographics.) Asked to prioritize the importance of their employers' and clients' 2013 technology initiatives, the U.S. CPAs and their Canadian counterparts responded with the same top two answers: managing and retaining data; and securing the IT (see Exhibit 1). There were some notable differences between the U.S. and Canadian respondents. poll found that the Canadian chartered accountants placed more emphasis than U.S. CPAs on using technology to enable decision support and analytics and on managing their IT investments and spending. U.S. respondents gave greater weight to managing IT risks, ensuring privacy, and, most notably, preventing and responding to computer fraud. CPA CONFIDENCE SLIPS U.S. CPAs surveyed were less confident than their Canadian counterparts of the ability of their organizations to achieve their top technology initiatives this year (see Exhibit 2). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesCommunication savante
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,373
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,036
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancyMême sujetInformation and Cyber SecurityTravaux en français237 207