MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W772360864

The Role of the Music Therapist in Promoting Parent-Infant Attachment/Favoriser L'attachement Parent-Enfant : Rôle Du Musicothérapeute

2014· article· fr· W772360864 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jane Edwards

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2014
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueInfant Health and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSingingMusic therapyImprovisationPsychologyDyadMusicalContext (archaeology)AttunementMelodyCommunicationDevelopmental psychologyVisual artsArtPsychotherapistMedicineHistory
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Infancy: Music and Music TherapyIn all cultures, music in earliest years of life appears in form of songs, chants, lullabies, and improvised vocal play that does not reference high-art cultural symbols; instead, music-making in these early years is a social relational resource available to all regardless of musical skill, knowledge, or training. When infants hear music they turn toward it, smile, and move. At same time, they produce rich, music-like vocal utterances that delight their parents, who respond by singing, cooing, and speaking in a special singsongy way with infinite rhythmic and melodic attunement. This way of using voice has been increasingly referred to as infant directed and has been shown to be preferred by infants as young as one month of age (Cooper & Aislin, 1990]. Originally called motherese, this special way of interacting with infants also has been noted to influence way adults sing to babies and very young children (Shoemark, 2011]. Regarding music therapy in context of parent-infant work, Edwards (2011] stated thatmusic therapy can be described as. . . a process of developing a relationship with a caregiver/dyad in order to support, develop and extend their skills in using musical and music like interactions including vocal improvisation, chants, lullabies, songs, and rhymes, to promote and enhance sensitivity and mutual co-regulation between infant and caregiver, in order to create optimal environment for secure attachment to be fostered. ( p. 6]Music therapists have provided dyadic programs (Oldfield, 2011] and have developed group work methods (Abad & Williams, 2007] to address needs of vulnerable parent-infant cohorts. Music therapy in this context is based on premise that caregiver and infant music-making can have useful functions for developing attachment skills through promoting development of synchronized, attuned, and sensitive inter-relating between parent and infant.Parent-Infant AttachmentAttachment theory was developed in a lifelong collaboration between American-Canadian developmental psychologist Mary Ainsworth and British psychoanalyst John Bowlby. The theory uses a range of sources of evidence to explain need for a child to have a secure base, in which consistent care is provided, for first years of life. Writing in 1991, Ainsworth and Bowlby described how they understood this theoretical contribution:Focusing on intimate interpersonal relations, attachment theory does not aspire to address all aspects of personality development. However, it is an open-ended theory and, we hope, open enough to be able to comprehend new findings that result from other approaches. From its outset it has been eclectic, drawing on a number of scientific disciplines, including developmental, cognitive, social and personality psychology, systems theory, and various branches of biological science, including genetics, (p. 10)In a healthy relationship caregiver affords emotional access to child and responds appropriately and promptly to his or her positive and negative states (Schore, 2001, p. 205). This supports adaptation of infant toward internal regulation functions that relate to the regulation of arousal, maintenance of alertness, capacity to dampen arousal in face of overstimulation, capacity to inhibit behavioral expression, and capacity to develop predictable behavioral cycles (Beebe & Lachmann, 1998, p. 485). This interpersonal and intrapsychic regulation of parentinfant dyad is considered in that interactive regulation flows in both directions, on a moment-to-moment basis, so that each experiences influencing, as well as being influenced by, other's behavior (Beebe & Lachmann, p. 500).The development of ability to relate and communicate has been described as a series of building blocks or developmental phases of intrapsychic and interpersonal capacity (Stern, 2000). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,783
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian journal of music therapyMême sujetInfant Health and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207