The Role of the Music Therapist in Promoting Parent-Infant Attachment/Favoriser L'attachement Parent-Enfant : Rôle Du Musicothérapeute
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Infancy: Music and Music TherapyIn all cultures, music in earliest years of life appears in form of songs, chants, lullabies, and improvised vocal play that does not reference high-art cultural symbols; instead, music-making in these early years is a social relational resource available to all regardless of musical skill, knowledge, or training. When infants hear music they turn toward it, smile, and move. At same time, they produce rich, music-like vocal utterances that delight their parents, who respond by singing, cooing, and speaking in a special singsongy way with infinite rhythmic and melodic attunement. This way of using voice has been increasingly referred to as infant directed and has been shown to be preferred by infants as young as one month of age (Cooper & Aislin, 1990]. Originally called motherese, this special way of interacting with infants also has been noted to influence way adults sing to babies and very young children (Shoemark, 2011]. Regarding music therapy in context of parent-infant work, Edwards (2011] stated thatmusic therapy can be described as. . . a process of developing a relationship with a caregiver/dyad in order to support, develop and extend their skills in using musical and music like interactions including vocal improvisation, chants, lullabies, songs, and rhymes, to promote and enhance sensitivity and mutual co-regulation between infant and caregiver, in order to create optimal environment for secure attachment to be fostered. ( p. 6]Music therapists have provided dyadic programs (Oldfield, 2011] and have developed group work methods (Abad & Williams, 2007] to address needs of vulnerable parent-infant cohorts. Music therapy in this context is based on premise that caregiver and infant music-making can have useful functions for developing attachment skills through promoting development of synchronized, attuned, and sensitive inter-relating between parent and infant.Parent-Infant AttachmentAttachment theory was developed in a lifelong collaboration between American-Canadian developmental psychologist Mary Ainsworth and British psychoanalyst John Bowlby. The theory uses a range of sources of evidence to explain need for a child to have a secure base, in which consistent care is provided, for first years of life. Writing in 1991, Ainsworth and Bowlby described how they understood this theoretical contribution:Focusing on intimate interpersonal relations, attachment theory does not aspire to address all aspects of personality development. However, it is an open-ended theory and, we hope, open enough to be able to comprehend new findings that result from other approaches. From its outset it has been eclectic, drawing on a number of scientific disciplines, including developmental, cognitive, social and personality psychology, systems theory, and various branches of biological science, including genetics, (p. 10)In a healthy relationship caregiver affords emotional access to child and responds appropriately and promptly to his or her positive and negative states (Schore, 2001, p. 205). This supports adaptation of infant toward internal regulation functions that relate to the regulation of arousal, maintenance of alertness, capacity to dampen arousal in face of overstimulation, capacity to inhibit behavioral expression, and capacity to develop predictable behavioral cycles (Beebe & Lachmann, 1998, p. 485). This interpersonal and intrapsychic regulation of parentinfant dyad is considered in that interactive regulation flows in both directions, on a moment-to-moment basis, so that each experiences influencing, as well as being influenced by, other's behavior (Beebe & Lachmann, p. 500).The development of ability to relate and communicate has been described as a series of building blocks or developmental phases of intrapsychic and interpersonal capacity (Stern, 2000). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».