Recognizing idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions in children: A practice imperative
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In North America, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) continue to be a major cause of morbidity, hospital admission and death (1). The above statement runs counter to the common assumption of health care professionals and the general public that, when drugs are approved for marketing, their safety has been clearly determined by the Federal Drug Administration in the United States and the Therapeutic Products Programme in Canada. There are some limitations to the drug approval process. With most drugs, approval for marketing is granted following phase III clinical trials. However, these trials are typically short in duration, are conducted in relatively small numbers of patients (usually involving hundreds, not thousands of patients) under conditions that are not clinically routine, and often exclude patients with co-morbidities and co-medications (2). Usually, early regulatory trials exclude children (3). Under the above investigative conditions, the most common ADRs will be observed (2) usually in adult populations exclusively; less common ADRs may be missed altogether. Idiosyncratic ADRs are unpredictable and difficult to prevent, if risk factors for occurrence are unknown. Idiosyncratic ADRs do not occur in most patients, may be unrelated to both the dose and the pharmacology of the drug, and can be potentially life-threatening. They include the most serious and dangerous ADRs known: lupus, bone marrow toxicity (aplastic anemia), hepatitis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (4,5). Clinically, idiosyncratic ADRs may occur immediately or become evident a few days or weeks after therapy. Patients may recover following discontinuation of the offending medication or show a continued, even fatal, reaction. Little is known about the mechanisms of most idiosyncratic ADRs; however, in some cases, they may be mediated by the immune system (6). Lack of knowledge about the causes of idiosyncratic ADRs prevents the ready identification of individual paediatric patients who may be at risk (7,8). Many factors may influence a child's response to a drug (eg, age, diet, concomitant medications, general health); however, one key factor is the child's genetic inheritance. The study of the interaction between drug response and genetic makeup is called pharmacogenetics. A major objective of pharmacogenetics is to determine the causes of ADRs or to predict recurrence. Achieving this objective will involve acquiring knowledge of which genes are responsible for the polymorphisms that lead to different drug response phenotypes. The targets of this inquiry are many, including but not limited to genes coding for proteins that are involved in the following: drug absorption; metabolism; transport to the site of activity; receptor binding; across-membrane transport; intracellular signal transduction; secretion and elimination; and the overall regulation of responses. However, neither a library of genomic information nor a set of clinically useful guidelines exists. Indeed, there is no test to predict beforehand (or to prove afterwards) that a particular drug causes (or caused) an idiosyncratic ADR in any individual patient (9), much less a child. Thus, there is little genetic testing that the practising clinician can use to anticipate an idiosyncratic ADR in his or her patient. If the promise of pharmacogenetics is still just a promise, what practical alternatives are available for paediatric populations? It has been suggested that many cases of idiosyncratic ADRs may be prevented or minimized by making only minor changes to the health care system (12). Suggested changes include the following: providing continuing education to prescribers so that they are better prepared to recognize early the onset of an idiosyncratic ADR; restricting the prescription of drugs that commonly cause serious idiosyncratic ADRs; providing patients and parents with written instructions that identify the early symptoms of idiosyncratic ADRs; and instituting periodic pharmacodynamic monitoring (eg, hematological assessments for possible bone marrow toxicity or hepatic assessments for possible liver toxicity). The authors of this paper agree with the first three recommendations. However, there is a lack of substantive evidence to suggest that periodic pharmacodynamic monitoring is useful in preventing or minimizing idiosyncratic ADRs. Given that the definition of an idiosyncratic ADR means that these reactions are unpredictable, ‘periodic’ monitoring is subject to wide interpretation as to when and how often a patient should be monitored. The cost of such an intervention would almost certainly outweigh the benefits in most situations at this time. The changes noted above would be a good first step to minimizing rare but, often, serious reactions. Furthermore, a process for the collection of ADR data (from both adult and paediatric populations), a commitment to interpret these data and a specific feedback process for the dissemination of this information is needed because the current system of voluntary reporting of ADRs is clearly inadequate. Dissemination of information is the most important, yet most conspicuously lacking, component of the current system. Idiosyncratic reactions will continue to occur. Routine monitoring is unlikely to aid in avoiding ADRs. In the absence of a proactive surveillance system that regularly polls paediatricians and pharmacists regarding the occurrence of ADRs in their practices, what is a busy paediatrician to do? Have a high index of suspicion when untoward effects are seen with recently initiated or changed drug therapy. Be aware of potential reactions by continuous review of the medical literature. Inform patients about likely initial symptoms of idiosyncratic ADRs. Report suspected ADRs to local experts in clinical pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacy, or allergy and immunology, and to ADR monitoring programs (Table 1). To whom should paediatricians report a suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR)? Paediatricians should report suspected ADRs to the following authorities: – local experts in clinical pharmacology; – the manufacturer; – a participating Health Canada regional ADR centre (the addresses of ADR centres are listed on the Web sites of Health Canada's Therapeutic Products Programme <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/forms/adverse_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/forms/adverse_f.pdf>); or – the Health Canada national ADR centre at Canadian Adverse Reaction Monitoring Program (CADRMP), Bureau of Licensed Product Assessment, Therapeutic Products Programme, Health Canada, Address Locator 0201C2, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1B9. Telephone 613-957-0337, fax 613-957-0335. The ADR Reporting Form can be found in the Canadian Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (13) or on the Web sites of the Therapeutic Products Programme listed above. The Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Program Guidelines for the Voluntary ADR Reporting by Health Professionals can be found at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/guides/adr/adr_guideline_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/guides/adr/adr_guideline_f.pdf>. Paediatricians should report suspected ADRs to the following authorities: – local experts in clinical pharmacology; – the manufacturer; – a participating Health Canada regional ADR centre (the addresses of ADR centres are listed on the Web sites of Health Canada's Therapeutic Products Programme <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/forms/adverse_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/forms/adverse_f.pdf>); or – the Health Canada national ADR centre at Canadian Adverse Reaction Monitoring Program (CADRMP), Bureau of Licensed Product Assessment, Therapeutic Products Programme, Health Canada, Address Locator 0201C2, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1B9. Telephone 613-957-0337, fax 613-957-0335. The ADR Reporting Form can be found in the Canadian Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (13) or on the Web sites of the Therapeutic Products Programme listed above. The Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Program Guidelines for the Voluntary ADR Reporting by Health Professionals can be found at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/guides/adr/adr_guideline_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/guides/adr/adr_guideline_f.pdf>. To whom should paediatricians report a suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR)? Paediatricians should report suspected ADRs to the following authorities: – local experts in clinical pharmacology; – the manufacturer; – a participating Health Canada regional ADR centre (the addresses of ADR centres are listed on the Web sites of Health Canada's Therapeutic Products Programme <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/forms/adverse_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/forms/adverse_f.pdf>); or – the Health Canada national ADR centre at Canadian Adverse Reaction Monitoring Program (CADRMP), Bureau of Licensed Product Assessment, Therapeutic Products Programme, Health Canada, Address Locator 0201C2, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1B9. Telephone 613-957-0337, fax 613-957-0335. The ADR Reporting Form can be found in the Canadian Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (13) or on the Web sites of the Therapeutic Products Programme listed above. The Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Program Guidelines for the Voluntary ADR Reporting by Health Professionals can be found at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/guides/adr/adr_guideline_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/guides/adr/adr_guideline_f.pdf>. Paediatricians should report suspected ADRs to the following authorities: – local experts in clinical pharmacology; – the manufacturer; – a participating Health Canada regional ADR centre (the addresses of ADR centres are listed on the Web sites of Health Canada's Therapeutic Products Programme <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/forms/adverse_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/forms/adverse_f.pdf>); or – the Health Canada national ADR centre at Canadian Adverse Reaction Monitoring Program (CADRMP), Bureau of Licensed Product Assessment, Therapeutic Products Programme, Health Canada, Address Locator 0201C2, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1B9. Telephone 613-957-0337, fax 613-957-0335. The ADR Reporting Form can be found in the Canadian Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (13) or on the Web sites of the Therapeutic Products Programme listed above. The Canadian Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Program Guidelines for the Voluntary ADR Reporting by Health Professionals can be found at <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/guides/adr/adr_guideline_e.pdf> and <http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/french/guides/adr/adr_guideline_f.pdf>.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».