Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Marika Pruska-Carroll. Russia Between Yesterday and Tomorrow. Montreal: Vehicule Press, 1995. 180 pp. Photographs. $17.95, paper. Like the early 1920s, the last years of perestroika and the beginnings of the new Federation spurred a cosmogony of visions and organizations operating on the assumption that all alternatives were open to Russia after the collapse of the old order. Marika Pruska-Caroll, professor of and Eastern European politics at Concordia University, was there to document those post-Soviet dreams, grievances, and opinions from the mouths of Russians from all walks of life. Hers is a book about everyday life in Russia based on over 150 taped interviews and conversations she had, as well as observations she made during her visits in Russia in the summers of 1992, 1993, and 1994. The author sought to register how Russians of different generations-men and women-looked upon the decade of reform that followed Gorbachev's coming to power. The material is organized in thematic but not seamless chapters and subchapters. The narrative often returns to some of the same topics. However, this is hardly a disadvantage. As her pen follows the flow of specific conversations and interviews with individual Russians, with whom she usually touched on more than one topic, Pruska-Caroll attains the unpretentious goal of becoming the reader's guide and translator on a tour of contemporary Russia. She records a mostly gloomy landscape of characters and problems in a nation confused and battered by changes, which left one out of every four Russians below the poverty level, industrial plants idle, and most public buildings dilapidated. Pruska-Caroll makes no conclusions other than the prevalence of glaring paradoxes and the volatility of post-Soviet Russia-not one but two different countries divided between the new and the old, the young and the aged, the rich and the poor, those who clung to their Soviet-era professions and those who found other, lucrative ones. New glittering shops in Moscow and St. Petersburg cater mostly to Mafia millionaires while sullen unemployed workers gulp down vodka in unlit back alleys. Youths are driven to crime, drugs, or prostitution to afford the cornucopia of imported products and lifestyles promoted on TV. Their mothers are consumed by angst and their fathers drink themselves to a slow vodka-induced death, emasculated by the inability to shield their families from degradation. Pruska-Caroll warns the reader that she has no academic pretensions. Like many scholars who were caught in the whirlwind of events in Eastern Europe and the Balkans, she believes that this was not the time for lengthy social studies. While dramatic change in the 1990s did overtake the methodological apparatus of many a social discipline, Pruska-Caroll is more modest than many who dispensed with scholarly methodology without relinquishing claims to academic integrity. Her book has few of the trappings and fewer of the usual shortcomings but most of the merits of scholarly work. The author did not strive less than most scholarly researchers to make her sample as representative as possible: young and old, urban and rural, bluecollar and professional, students and dropouts, historic capitals, provincial towns and forsaken villages in European Russia. She meticulously describes the background of her interviewees and parameters of her encounters. She is a perceptive observer, spelling out remarks that might elude the casual reader, such as the stark polarization between male university students who harp on the impalpable qualities of the mystical Russian soul, and women who disassociate themselves from assumed distinctive values. Focusing her inquiry on a list of eighty most frequently asked questions of her students about Russia, Pruska-Caroll remains anchored in reality and tackles issues that have perplexed researchers and common folk alike in the West. In fact, the relative informality of her project may have increased the value of the answers Pruska-Caroll received. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».