MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W777106648

Andrew Griffith. Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism

2015· article· en· W777106648 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nelson Wiseman

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian ethnic studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePolitical Systems and Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitizenshipMulticulturalismPoliticsIdeologyLawGovernment (linguistics)ImmigrationAnecdotePolitical sciencePublic administrationSociology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Andrew Griffith. Policy Arrogance or Innocent Bias: Resetting Citizenship and Multiculturalism. Ottawa, ON: Anar Press, 2013. 120 pp. Notes. $14.99 sc. This slim but informative book sheds light on the understudied subject of the relations between political masters and their civil servants. Penned by a thoughtful former public servant who toiled on multicultural issues for three decades in the Departments of Canadian Heritage and more recently Citizenship and Immigration, Andrew Griffith offers a cautionary tale: when governments change, public servants must be prepared to jettison long held assumptions regarding operational as well as policy issues. Griffith witnessed the events associated with the shifting of responsibility for multiculturalism from one department to another. Public administration guru Gilies Paquet encouraged Griffith to write the book and Griffith delivers a trenchant case study in policy change management as a participant-observer. Some smartly titled chapters--Which Ideology Will that Be? Would That Be Evidence Or Anecdote? and So What Kind of 'Yes Minister' Will That Be? communicate competing worldviews. Elected in 2006, the Conservatives have been less sanguine than most civil servants about government as a positive force. Each side is convinced of its rectitude. One has a mandate to deliver on its platform promises and seeks to fulfil them; the other offers large-scale survey evidence and the lessons of its experience in the policy trenches. The current responsible minister and undisputed czar of multicultural policy, Jason Kenney, is a senior cabinet member trusted by the prime minister and less tethered than most ministers to the PMO's leash and talking points. He also wields substantial influence as chair of the cabinet's operations committee, which is tasked with the day-to-day coordination of the government's agenda including issues management and communications. He has had significant success in weaning new Canadians from their attachment to the Liberals and wooing them to the Conservative banner. According to Griffith, Kenney--once cloaked in a robe by a Filipino organization and crowned on a throne with a sash festooned across his chest proclaiming him the King of Multiculturalism--actually endeavours to deemphasize older approaches to multiculturalism policy and to strengthen his government's preferred narrative of Canadian citizenship. Kenney's determination to drive the bureaucracy and not be driven by it shines through. What emerges is this minister's strong sense of purpose, which precipitated trauma among his officials. They were surprised the Conservatives assumed power with ready-made answers and conclusions rather than questions. Civil servants did not appreciate the Conservatives' discomfort with long-standing multiculturalism and citizenship policies. For decades, bureaucrats had internalized the multicultural regime established by Pierre Trudeau's Liberals and extended by Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservatives and their Liberal successors. The sharper ideological edge (21) of the new Conservative vision harkens back to some Reform party positions of the 1990s: doing away with the Department of Multiculturalism and thus deemphasizing Canadians' racial, cultural, and linguistic differences, i. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,312
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,423
Tête enseignante GPT0,452
Écart entre enseignants0,029 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian ethnic studiesMême sujetPolitical Systems and GovernanceTravaux en français237 207