MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W780005616

On a Classic Thinker, Classically

2014· article· en· W780005616 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jakub Bazyli Motrenko

Notice bibliographique

RevuePolish Sociological Review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEmile Durkheim and Sociology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographySociologyNarrativePolityReading (process)GreenwichBrotherClassicsMedia studiesLawArt historyLiteratureHistoryAnthropologyPoliticsArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

On a Classic Thinker, Classically Marcel Fournier, Emile Durkheim. A Biography, Cambridge 2013 : Polity Press, 866 pp. ISBN: 9780745646459Six years after the publication of the French edition, an English translation has appeared of a biography of Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) by Marcel Fournier, a professor at the University of Montreal. The book is an event for historians of sociologya new synthesis of the research that has been done in the thirty-five years since Steven Lukes' groundbreaking work. Reading Fournier's book is not only important for historians of the discipline, however, but for all sociologists, as Durkheim's work forms part of the fund of knowledge shared by all researchers. Classic sociological writings form part of the outlook of every representative of the social sciences; they integrate and stabilize the academic community, while simultaneously still giving impetus to its undertakings.The biography by Fournier is long. With the footnotes, which make an essential supplement to the text, it has 866 pages. It presents Durkheim polymorphically as a scholar, teacher, lecturer, active participant in academic discussions, observer of social change, sometimes politically engaged intellectual, editor of L'Annee sociologique, leader of a social sciences school, authority and mentor for his young colleagues, regent of the Sorbonne, Jew, neurasthenic, son, brother, husband, and father. This biography makes Durkheim's sociology, which we study in the first years of our university education, an organic element in the tale of a genuine human being: a tale that is very traditional in its aims, forms, and manner of narration.The book keeps Durkheim in a central position. It is not an attempt to speak about the history of something else through a biographic prism. If, on the occasion, Fournier writes fascinatingly about French Judaism, about the schools and universities of the Third Republic, intellectual climate, academic ethos, political and scientific disputes, mentalities and habits, of the occupation of Alsace, the Dreyfus Affair, or the First World War, it is because Durkheim's life was entwined with all of these. They constitute, however, a background: reconstruction of the historical, cultural, political, and intellectual context allows the individual, socially located therein, to be understood without eliminating his subjective autonomy.Fournier's book adopts the most obvious form for a biography: Durkheim's life is presented in chronological order. The impression is that the author is guided solely by the sources available-most readily, wherever possible, allowing the protagonist to speak for himself. The biography is very heavily supplied with quotes and these have been linked to form a fine narrative. Fournier speculates unwillingly; he constantly bases himself, in every detail, on the source material, confronting one with the other and leaving questions unresolved where no further evidentiary proceedings are possible. The collection of sources and limiting of authorial commentary and interpretation are intended to ensure the biography's scientific validity. Obviously, Fournier, as a student of Pierre Bourdieu, will not have succumbed to the 'biographical illusion'. He is aware that all biographical writing endows the described life with meaning. Fournier consciously makes use of past biographical achievements, the sociology of science, and the history of ideas. The strength of the book is its realization of theoretical postulates without burdening the text with a theoretical apparatus. We are provided with an unusually thick description, to which, at least to a certain degree, we can give our own theoretical sense. The work is open in a dual sense: it can be supplemented by successive discoveries of fact, but above all, both Durkheim's life and his work can be grasped within the theoretical structure.Fournier's work does not provide a new, breakthrough interpretation of Durkheim's thought; the biography reconstructs the context of discovery and not its justification. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,866
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,330 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePolish Sociological ReviewMême sujetEmile Durkheim and SociologyTravaux en français237 207