Timeline in stone| Lithic indications of social and economic change at Housepit 7 of the Keatley Creek Site
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Keatley Creek site is a large, winter housepit village located on the Canadian Plateau in British Columbia, Canada.Past research and more recent excavations conducted by the University of Montana in 1999Montana in ,2001Montana in , and 2002 have focused on Housepit 7, one of the largest housepit features within the village core.Two models have been developed that attempt to explain the emergence of large, aggregated villages like Keatley Creek.The more established aggrandizer model suggests that such villages, with their attendant socioeconomic complexity, emerged as a result of a strong, sustained focus on plentiful and highly predictable salmon runs in the Mid-Fraser River.Individuals desiring elevated status and power manipulated surplus salmon for their benefit, which resulted in the early rise of inequality and ranking on the individual and household levels, as well as differential access to resources.These hallmarks of complexity arose during the late Shuswap Horizon (ca.3500-2400B.P.) and remained stable until the abandonment of the village.A second, alternative model asserts that the changing environment played a more active role in the evolution of cultural structures and subsequent emergence of socioeconomic complexity at Keatley Creek.Building upon an earlier established foundation, socioeconomic complexity did not fully develop until the early Kamloops Horizon (ca.1200-200 B.P.), and under drought conditions.Local resource shortages, intense competition, and the use of new technologies resulted in pronounced inequality, ranking, and differential access to resources late at the Keatley Creek site.This model is dynamic, and suggests people responded directly to changing environmental conditions.In order to test these two propositions, this research analyzes lithic artifacts and raw materials excavated from Housepit 7 of the Keatley Creek site by the University of Montana.Lithic technology is placed within organizational and functional frameworks, and plotted along a new Housepit 7 timeline that spans the period of approximately 1815 B.P. to village abandonment at 800 B.P. These organizational and functional lithic data demonstrate that logistical mobility increased over time as subsistence shifted to a stronger focus on terrestrial resources, patterns of which peaked during the latest occupation phases of Housepit 7. Prestige-associated lithic raw material and prestige item fi-equencies and diversity are also greatest late in the life of the house.These implications of lithic use and discard meet those predicted under the alternative, evolutionary model of emergent socioeconomic complexity
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».