Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rural Literacies: Transnational PerspectivesCitation: White, S. (2014). Book review Rethinking literacies: Transnational perspectives. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 29(4), 1-2.Rethinking Rural Literacies: Transnational Perspectives co-edited by Bill Green and Michael Corbett, brings together international scholars from two distinctive fields-rural and literacy studies-to provide scholarly insights into the role and significance of literacy practice and in and for development. Collectively the chapters seek to and contribute to a deeper understanding of how such notions literacies, education, social justice, and place- consciousness together might better serve our world. What emerges from the chapters in this book is that is indeed no essential (p. 8) and yet across and between the chapters a greater sense of rurality is intimately evoked.The book deliberately returns to, and builds from, the term first coined by Donehower, Hogg and Schnell (2007) in the book of the same name. In the original text the term is defined literate skills needed to achieve the goals of sustaining life in areas (p. 4). In this new book the term is redefined within the broader transnational perspectives such mobility, globalisation and place and space. Authors from multiple international perspectives including Australia, Canada, the United States and Finland all come together to examine and explore the intersection of contemporary research in literacy/literacies from the perspective of rurality that globalisation opens (p. 2). In so doing the book seeks to renew and extend a socio-critical interest in the understanding of the term from a wider global perspective. As such, the book explores multiple, mutable and mobile and ever relational, they inevitably float in a global sea (p. 12).The book's overall theoretical orientation draws upon three strands of thinking; the idea of place-conscious it applies to literacy education; the view of literacy a practice, and; the notion of justice (Gruenewald, 2003). The significant contributions of this book include the ways it examines these three inter- related strands, how it encourages the reader to rethink the relations between the non-human and human world, and particularly the way it extends the notion of eco-social justice. Rautio and Lanas (Chapter 11) do this particularly well. While caveats and caution are attached to the shared definition of rurality, as the eco-social world beyond the Metropolis (p. 2), it is a definition that many of the authors take up and explore. As Kerkham and Comber (p. 197) in their chapter highlight there is now wider recognition that 'social justice' may need rethinking to foreground the nonhuman world and the relation between people and politics of places, people and environments in terms of eco- justice.The text is organized thematically into four sections: Conceptualizing Rural Literacies; Literacy/Pedagogies; Place and Sustainability, and; Mobilities and Futures. Depending on ones' own research or scholarly interests the reader may choose to connect with an idea, author, focus, place or methodological stance. All chapters consider the three theoretical orientations. In the first section, the authors here open the literacies and rural education discourse(s) and examine and foreground for other chapters the different but complimentary ways in which these two scholarships dialogue together. Howley's chapter brings mathematical into the conversation, further expanding the notion of rural literacies. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle